The Dylan Storm Roof Manifesto w/ Commentary

So it was either this or a Sharknado 3 review. Given all of the nonsense about Charleston and the shooting, and the refusal of the corporate media to publish the entirety of the manifesto, I feel better about doing this.

I was not raised in a racist home or environment. Living in the South, almost every White person has a small amount of racial awareness, simply beause of the numbers of negroes in this part of the country. But it is a superficial awareness. Growing up, in school, the White and black kids would make racial jokes toward each other, but all they were were jokes. Me and White friends would sometimes would watch things that would make us think that “blacks were the real racists” and other elementary thoughts like this, but there was no real understanding behind it.

Just based on the opening, it appears Dylan Roof is a product of American education. Even as he prepares to declare himself a white nationalist, it’s not his fault or his choice. You see, it’s not his fault, but was those blacks who were “the real racists.” With that said, yes, black people can be racist and are. Black people gleefully rant about Whites, other blacks, Hispanics, Arabs, and Jews. Good God Almighty do black people love to whine about Jews. The Nation of Islam/fake Muslims are the worst offenders.

The event that truly awakened me was the Trayvon Martin case. I kept hearing and seeing his name, and eventually I decided to look him up. I read the Wikipedia article and right away I was unable to understand what the big deal was. It was obvious that Zimmerman was in the right. But more importantly this prompted me to type in the words “black on White crime” into Google, and I have never been the same since that day. The first website I came to was the Council of Conservative Citizens. There were pages upon pages of these brutal black on White murders. I was in disbelief. At this moment I realized that something was very wrong. How could the news be blowing up the Trayvon Martin case while hundreds of these black on White murders got ignored?

Here we arrive at Roof’s Damascus road moment, his awakening beneath the Bodhi tree. Trayvon Martin. White/Hispanic/Black/Jew kills black kid who was just going for some Arizona watermelon juice and Skittles. Except that’s not what happened. That day, a young hothead who was allowed to run wild by his mother met a wannabe cop who forgot that you have to get the badge before you can go hunt Negroes like deer. Two idiots walked into the Thunderdome, one walked out. It’s a shame they didn’t take each other out. Thugs and cops are two peas in a pod.
More importantly, Roof learned something true: That the corporate media pushes a narrative on the American people, irrespective of any inconvenient facts . However, being armed with this newly discovered truth, Roof concludes that “they’re picking on us white people!” and focuses the bulk of his outrage on “black on white murders,” rather than the more rational conclusion: the media is full of shit.
According the FBI, there are more black on white murders than white on black. In most reported instances, whites are more likely to kill other white people and blacks are more likely to kill other black people.

From this point I researched deeper and found out what was happening in Europe. I saw that the same things were happening in England and France, and in all the other Western European countries. Again I found myself in disbelief. As an American we are taught to accept living in the melting pot, and black and other minorities have just as much right to be here as we do, since we are all immigrants. But Europe is the homeland of White people, and in many ways the situation is even worse there. From here I found out about the Jewish problem and other issues facing our race, and I can say today that I am completely racially aware.

I’m not sure what’s worse: the idea that black people have the power to destroy America, or his comparing the French to Americans. Oh, and somehow, the Jews will be to blame. This ought to be great.


I think it is is fitting to start off with the group I have the most real life experience with, and the group that is the biggest problem for Americans.
Niggers are stupid and violent. At the same time they have the capacity to be very slick. Black people view everything through a racial lense. Thats what racial awareness is, its viewing everything that happens through a racial lense. They are always thinking about the fact that they are black. This is part of the reason they get offended so easily, and think that some thing are intended to be racist towards them, even when a White person wouldnt be thinking about race. The other reason is the Jewish agitation of the black race.
Black people are racially aware almost from birth, but White people on average dont think about race in their daily lives. And this is our problem. We need to and have to.

Mr. Roof wants to wow the reader with his thorough analysis of black people. To start, he calls all black people stupid and violent, but black people are also very slick. So blacks are stupid….except when they aren’t. Then he almost compliments black people by saying black people view the world through a racial lens. The proof of this is that black people are easily offended and looking for ways to be offended. Also, the Jews are at fault for this. However, white people need to view the world through a race lens as well.
What makes this ridiculous is to simply observe black people in America. Refer back to Roof’s Trayvon Martin reference and his reference of black on white crime. Zimmerman is exonerated. Meanwhile, most of the black people who are charged with killing white people serve hefty prison sentences or get the death penalty. And there is that whole “white cops killing black suspects” business. More tellingly, black people are politically and economically, at the bottom of the totem pole in America. Clearly, viewing the world through a racial lens is not serving black people as well as Mr. Roof thinks it does.

 Say you were to witness a dog being beat by a man. You are almost surely going to feel very sorry for that dog. But then say you were to witness a dog biting a man. You will most likely not feel the same pity you felt for the dog for the man. Why? Because dogs are lower than men.
This same analogy applies to black and White relations. Even today, blacks are subconsciously viewed by White people are lower beings. They are held to a lower standard in general. This is why they are able to get away with things like obnoxious behavior in public. Because it is expected of them.
Modern history classes instill a subconscious White superiority complex in Whites and an inferiority complex in blacks. This White superiority complex that comes from learning of how we dominated other peoples is also part of the problem I have just mentioned. But of course I dont deny that we are in fact superior.

Here lies the essential mental poison that is collectivism: A collectivist takes on the grievances of others as their own and take undeserved pride in accomplishments and deeds that are not theirs. It’s all well a good to discuss how the teaching of history affects learners, but Dylan Roof was likely never in any danger of doing anything great or being anyone important, yet his little chest swells with pride at the thought of how “we” (he means other people who may have looked similar to him) dominated other people. On the opposite side of the coin, he takes great umbrage at the thought of his sacred white blood being spilled by a Negro. But as pointed out before, he’s more likely to be bagged and tagged by a fellow white. Collectivism does not yield in the face of reason or truth, which is what makes it so dangerous.

 I wish with a passion that niggers were treated terribly throughout history by Whites, that every White person had an ancestor who owned slaves, that segregation was an evil an oppressive institution, and so on. Because if it was all it true, it would make it so much easier for me to accept our current situation. But it isnt true. None of it is. We are told to accept what is happening to us because of ancestors wrong doing, but it is all based on historical lies, exaggerations and myths. I have tried endlessly to think of reasons we deserve this, and I have only came back more irritated because there are no reasons.
Only a fourth to a third of people in the South owned even one slave. Yet every White person is treated as if they had a slave owning ancestor. This applies to in the states where slavery never existed, as well as people whose families immigrated after slavery was abolished. I have read hundreds of slaves narratives from my state. And almost all of them were positive. One sticks out in my mind where an old ex-slave recounted how the day his mistress died was one of the saddest days of his life. And in many of these narratives the slaves told of how their masters didnt even allowing whipping on his plantation.

Slavery really wasn’t that bad. Honest. This is Lost Cause justification at its best and deserves no more rebuttal than this: a nation that claims to stand for equality before the law and natural rights cannot reasonably hold that humans have no rights based on being born the wrong color.
With that said, I don’t doubt that there are slave narratives in which the slave or freedman spoke positively of their enslavement. Some people have no desire to be free, as is evidenced by the number of people who gladly support higher taxation and the abridgement of rights in exchange for the empty promise of safety from Communists, Drug Dealers, Militias, Terrorists, or whoever the enemy of the day may be.

        Segregation was not a bad thing. It was a defensive measure. Segregation did not exist to hold back negroes. It existed to protect us from them. And I mean that in multiple ways. Not only did it protect us from having to interact with them, and from being physically harmed by them, but it protected us from being brought down to their level. Integration has done nothing but bring Whites down to level of brute animals. The best example of this is obviously our school system.

Mr. Roof forgets that segregation was premised on the idea of “separate by equal.” History demonstrated that the separate was never equal.

 Now White parents are forced to move to the suburbs to send their children to “good schools”. But what constitutes a “good school”? The fact is that how good a school is considered directly corresponds to how White it is. I hate with a passion the whole idea of the suburbs. To me it represents nothing but scared White people running. Running because they are too weak, scared, and brainwashed to fight. Why should we have to flee the cities we created for the security of the suburbs? Why are the suburbs secure in the first place? Because they are White. The pathetic part is that these White people dont even admit to themselves why they are moving. They tell themselves it is for better schools or simply to live in a nicer neighborhood. But it is honestly just a way to escape niggers and other minorities.
But what about the White people that are left behind? What about the White children who, because of school zoning laws, are forced to go to a school that is 90 percent black? Do we really think that that White kid will be able to go one day without being picked on for being White, or called a “white boy”? And who is fighting for him? Who is fighting for these White people forced by economic circumstances to live among negroes? No one, but someone has to.

Mr. Roof has actually given a really good summary of white flight. He neglects the other side, which is gentrification, but he can be forgiven for that. What’s really interesting is that this is Dylan’s second mention of the “horror” of being white in a school with equal or majority black students. Almost sounds like a personal grievances turned political. The personal is  political? How could that possibly go wrong?

 Here I would also like to touch on the idea of a Norhtwest Front. I think this idea is beyond stupid. Why should I for example, give up the beauty and history of my state to go to the Norhthwest? To me the whole idea just parralells the concept of White people running to the suburbs. The whole idea is pathetic and just another way to run from the problem without facing it.
Some people feel as though the South is beyond saving, that we have too many blacks here. To this I say look at history. The South had a higher ratio of blacks when we were holding them as slaves. Look at South Africa, and how such a small minority held the black in apartheid for years and years. Speaking of South Africa, if anyone thinks that think will eventually just change for the better, consider how in South Africa they have affirmative action for the black population that makes up 80 percent of the population.
It is far from being too late for America or Europe. I believe that even if we made up only 30 percent of the population we could take it back completely. But by no means should we wait any longer to take drastic action.

Long story short, Mr. Roof wants a race war, not white flight or a Pacific Northwestern “white homeland” (don’t they have about 50 homelands in Europe? ).

 Anyone who thinks that White and black people look as different as we do on the outside, but are somehow magically the same on the inside, is delusional. How could our faces, skin, hair, and body structure all be different, but our brains be exactly the same? This is the nonsense we are led to believe.
Negroes have lower Iqs, lower impulse control, and higher testosterone levels in generals. These three things alone are a recipe for violent behavior. If a scientist publishes a paper on the differences between the races in Western Europe or Americans, he can expect to lose his job. There are personality traits within human families, and within different breeds of cats or dogs, so why not within the races?
A horse and a donkey can breed and make a mule, but they are still two completely different animals. Just because we can breed with the other races doesnt make us the same.
In a modern history class it is always emphasized that, when talking about “bad” things Whites have done in history, they were White. But when we lern about the numerous, almost countless wonderful things Whites have done, it is never pointed out that these people were White. Yet when we learn about anything important done by a black person in history, it is always pointed out repeatedly that they were black. For example when we learn about how George Washington carver was the first nigger smart enough to open a peanut.

Let’s recap real quick: “Niggers” are violent, stupid, have low IQs (repeating stupid), lower impulse control (repeating violent), and higher testosterone. And George Washington Carver was the first “nigger” smart enough to open a peanut. With all of this in mind, black people are an existential threat to the United States. The contradictions in the thinking of racists is real comedy. A group of people, who are convinced to your core are your inferiors, have taken your cities and driven you to the suburbs, and are a threat to your way of life, but somehow, they are “inferior.”

        On another subject I want to say this. Many White people feel as though they dont have a unique culture. The reason for this is that White culture is world culture. I dont mean that our culture is made up of other cultures, I mean that our culture has been adopted by everyone in the world. This makes us feel as though our culture isnt special or unique. Say for example that every business man in the world wore a kimono, that every skyscraper was in the shape of a pagoda, that every door was a sliding one, and that everyone ate every meal with chopsticks. This would probably make a Japanese man feel as though he had no unique traditional culture.

I have noticed a great disdain for race mixing White women within the White nationalists community, bordering on insanity it. These women are victims, and they can be saved. Stop.

I’m going to ignore the bullshit comparison of business suits and kimonos, and skyscrapers and pagodas (white nationalist weeaboo?) for the more interesting part: Miscegenation. Mr. Roof doesn’t hate the white women (white nationalist have some funny names for women who step outside of the race), because they are “victims.” These poor white dears, they’re just hypnotized by Negroes, with their marijuana and their wild jazz music. Our great racist villain, Mr. Roof, hates black people, but is ready and willing to put white women on a pedestal high enough to reach the heavens. Imagine that; Gynocentrism and white nationalism are compatible.


Unlike many White naitonalists, I am of the opinion that the majority of American and European jews are White. In my opinion the issues with jews is not their blood, but their identity. I think that if we could somehow destroy the jewish identity, then they wouldnt cause much of a problem. The problem is that Jews look White, and in many cases are White, yet they see themselves as minorities. Just like niggers, most jews are always thinking about the fact that they are jewish. The other issue is that they network. If we could somehow turn every jew blue for 24 hours, I think there would be a mass awakening, because people would be able to see plainly what is going on.

His knowledge of the Jews is even more lacking and faulty than his knowledge of black people. I am truly surprised. If he were the student of history he imagines himself to be, he’d know that others have tried to forcibly destroy the Jewish identity and culture. It usually doesn’t stop assholes from chasing them, screaming about “conversos” or “Secret Jews.”
And I’m sure the Sephardim would be pleasantly surprised to learn that they are really just white people.


Hispanics are obviously a huge problem for Americans. But there are good hispanics and bad hispanics. I remember while watching hispanic television stations, the shows and even the commercials were more White than our own. They have respect for White beauty, and a good portion of hispanics are White. It is a well known fact that White hispanics make up the elite of most hispanics countries. There is good White blood worht saving in Uruguay, Argentina, Chile and even Brasil.

But they are still our enemies.

He left out the country that produced most of the white Spanish-speakers: Spain.

                                              East Asians


I have great respent for the East Asian races. Even if we were to go extinct they could carry something on. They are by nature very racist and could be great allies of the White race. I am not opposed at all to allies with the Northeast Asian races.

Awww, isn’t that precious? He thinks that racists of a feather flock together. Little does he know that the Han supremacists despise white people with the same vehemence that he does black people.



I hate the sight of the American flag. Modern American patriotism is an absolute joke. People pretending like they have something to be proud while White people are being murdered daily in the streets. Many veterans believe we owe them something for “protecting our way of life” or “protecting our freedom”. But im not sure what way of life they are talking about. How about we protect the White race and stop fighting for the jews. I will say this though, I myself would have rather lived in 1940’s American than Nazi Germany, and no this is not ignorance speaking, it is just my opinion. So I dont blame the veterans of any wars up until after Vietnam, because at least they had an American to be proud of and fight for.

He would rather retreat into the mythical past (aka the 1940s) when the Negroes knew their place (Segregation), white women knew their place (homemakers and mothers of the race), and America didn’t fight for the Jews.

                               An Explanation

To take a saying from a film, “I see all this stuff going on, and I dont see anyone doing anything about it. And it pisses me off.”. To take a saying from my favorite film, “Even if my life is worth less than a speck of dirt, I want to use it for the good of society.”.

I have no choice. I am not in the position to, alone, go into the ghetto and fight. I chose Charleston because it is most historic city in my state, and at one time had the highest ratio of blacks to Whites in the country. We have no skinheads, no real KKK, no one doing anything but talking on the internet. Well someone has to have the bravery to take it to the real world, and I guess that has to be me.

Unfortunately at the time of writing I am in a great hurry and some of my best thoughts, actually many of them have been to be left out and lost forever. But I believe enough great White minds are out there already.


Please forgive any typos, I didnt have time to check it.

If nobody will race war with him, he’ll just race war by himself. Here’s where we arrive at the conclusion.
My takeaway from reading this is that Dylan Roof is a kid, probably went to school with black kids, who fed him plates of shit for being a “white boy” and worse, being an uncool white boy. The George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin affair wasn’t a great awakening, it gave him a target for a lifetime of anger, the sort of anger that a powerless man feels. Dylan Roof had no power of his own but the most basic and natural of power, to kill. Like many powerless people, he realized the truth of his powerlessness. Rather than blame the foremost party, himself, he sought to blame someone else. Rather than seek self-improvement, he retreated into fantasies of a past that never was (the glorious 1940s). He had no accomplishments of his, which is why he hung his hat on the deeds of people who came before him just because they resembled him. And he turned his personal grievances into political positions.

Or maybe the Confederate flag made him do it.



Awful Lot of Honkies Here: MSNBC Complains Hillary Rally Is Too Small, Too White

Likely my first and last Family Guy reference.

Team Blue is less and less able to sell the party, much less the American public, on a Hillary Clinton coronation. The people who are wasting valuable air time that could be given to episodes of Lockup, the MSNBC weekend talking heads, opined, not about the lack of ideological diversity, but the lack of racial/sexual diversity in the Hillary crowd. The lack of people was also a source of concern for Team Blue AgitProp Channel #4. MSNBC’s handwringing about “diversity” exposes the problem of marketing-based political campaigning in America, in which Americans are no longer given actual policies to weigh and compare, but are subject to ad campaigns better-suited to selling toothpaste or insurance than electing the head of the executive branch and entrusting them all of the Constitutional powers that office is entails (Choosy Moms Chose Hillary! 9 Out 10 Dentists Choose Rand Paul! Between Love and Madness Lies Bernie Sanders! Good Things Happen When Ben Carson Comes To Town! Marco Rubio: Good To The Last Drop! You’re In Good Hands with Obama! Black Lesbian Trade Unionists For [Insert Candidate Here]!)


Domestic Abuser Claims She Was Raped At Universal Studios

24-year-old Clermont woman Theresa Marie Gaitan, already charged with domestic abuse, added false rape to her list of legal problems. Gaitan lied to the police about being raped at Universal Studios, claiming that “a man with black teeth” threw her to the ground in the parking garage and raped her.

Rather than just believing her, the police actually investigated her claim. Based on review of the surveillance tapes in the garage (not a rape in sight) and her phone calls (never mentioned being raped), the police did what any rape culture-loving patriarchs would do: they questioned her claim. Sexist bastards. When faced with physical evidence of her false claim, Gaitan admitted that she lied.

She was already jailed for domestic violence for attacking her ex-boyfriend because he wouldn’t speak to her. Gaitan is currently held without bail for domestic violence, filing a false police report, perjury, and probation violation.

Believe her. Oh, and the county spent $1000 for a sexual assault nurse and a rape kit on a rape that didn’t actually happen. Nice. Very nice.



Archived Source

Putting Their Lives on the Line Every Day: Overton Police Bravely Shut Down Black Market Lemonade Stand

The Overton, Texas police, having met their traffic ticket quota for the month, decided that it was in the best interest of the public that they strap on their guns, their bullet proof vests, and their tasers, and go shut down some kids’ lemonade stand. The two outlaw entrepreneurs, Andria and Zoey Green, had a goal of $100 of capital, so they could take their father, an oil field worker, to Splash Kingdom for Father’s Day. May I point out that Splash Kingdom looks pretty kick ass. Good idea, girls. After the girls made $25, Overton’s finest, put their lives on the line and told the mini-capitalists that they were in violation of TX House Bill 970, which requires a $150 permit and a health department inspection. Thankfully, the girls showed the proper respect for AUTHORITAH, and the police forbore from their God given right to slam them to the ground, dislocate their limbs, tase them, crush their windpipes, beat them into submission, or just shoot them. But the girls’ mother, thanks to the power of the internet, discovered a loophole: They could give away the contraband lemonade for free and take donations. Not only did the girls make their goal, gain valuable venture capital and fundraising experience, but Splash Kingdom, after hearing of this latest incident of police dickheadedness and sensing an opportunity for good publicity, gave the girls free passes.

The Copsucker View:

“The law is the law, and the cops have no choice but to enforce it!”


I didn’t know cops checked their moral agency when they put on the badge. I’m glad that when the police get the law to inter the Japanese, or the Jews, or the Blacks, or the Arabs, or whoever else is collectively deemed enemies of the homelands, they’ll have no choice but to obey. It’s not like there have ever been bad laws, or immoral laws or anything, or that they have discretion in the absence of direct orders from superiors.

Source 1

Source 2

Bitches Be Tripping: Rachel Dolezal Pretends to Black. Black People Elect Her President. Stuff Goes Wrong.

Hilarious, hilarious, HILARIOUS, stuff happened today. The head of the NAACP in Spokane, Washington, Rachel Dolezal, was exposed, by her own parents, as….WHITE. My first question would be, are these people really her parents? Are these pictures of the freckle-faced blonde teenager authentic? Assuming the answer to the first two is “yes,” is this chick really as nuts as she appears?

The white people in Montana claiming to be her parents gave a birth certificate to CNN. This doesn’t follow all the rules of evidence, but….I’ll allow it. They claim they didn’t know about this “Black Like Me” psychodrama their daughter was engaged in until they saw it in the newspaper.

For the time being, I’ll ignore the media noise machine on Ms. Dolezal and get information about the woman in question in her own words. According to her Linkedin page, she is a “Professor of Africana Studies,” President of the Spokane, Washington chapter of the NAACP, Chairwoman of the Office of Police Ombudsman Commission, talking head for The Inlander newspaper, and Master Artist at Dolezal Studios. This is the first indication that she can’t be black. She has too many jobs . She lists among her interests “Diversity Awareness,” “International Human Rights,” “Feminist Theory,” and “LGBTQQI Studies” (One more “B” and we can have a BBQ). So she ticks off all of the necessary boxes for her Progressive, academic, more caring than thou, bona fides (not by doing anything mind you, but she really feels strongly about things).

A little more information. Rachel lays some groundwork, or trickles out just a little bit of truth last year in an interview with Spokane Favs:

Most people know about W.E.B. Du Bois and Ida B. Wells, but not everyone knows about white founders like Mary White Ovington and Oswald Garrison Villard. The civil rights struggle is one that includes advocacy for historically oppressed groups such as people of color, women, and people living with disabilities; racial justice is not disconnected from other avenues of civil rights and social justice.

I’d guess I’m also one of the youngest presidents. As a single mom who has lived on the poverty line and identifies as bisexual, perhaps some of my other demographics are also a first for Spokane. I know there is a strong majority of older straight men with strong church ties leading many of the branches nationally.

Let’s see, let’s see: Minimizes and conflates the oppression of black people with women and handicapped (yep, being black is as bad as missing a leg), glorifies youth above experience or reason, glorifies single motherhood, attention whores herself out as a bisexual, and subtly denigrates “older, straight men.” It’s like these people read from a script, or are trying to get on the great invisible Progressive scoreboard for how NOT heterosexual, white, male, or Christian they can be. Try to deal with black people’s issues as black people’s issues and not try to shoehorn them into the Grand Unified Theory of the Proletariat.

Rachel Dolezal probably is a little nuts. But rather than focus on the easy surface issues in which some media outlets have compared her antics to the blackface minstrel shows of a century ago, or the lie itself, I would rather hit two points with regard to Ms. Dolezal: Attention whoring and hijacking of black oppression. With respect to the attention whoring, I don’t know Ms. Dolezal personally, I don’t know her past apart from what’s been reported in the media, and I haven’t analyzed her life in depth. But rationally, I can take a guess at her motivation. Average looking girl, doesn’t stand out among the rest of the white blondes in Mississippi, kind of artsy, mom and dad hang out with these interesting black people, and wants to stand apart from the crowd and yell at the world “Pay attention to me! I exist!” She doesn’t go in a Lady Gaga or Madonna direction. She decides she’ll go in an African direction. Curiosity turns to interest, interest turns to obsession, obsession turns white woman into a black woman. Reinforcing this obsession is the laughable notion of “white privilege” which is just “white guilt” repackaged for the millennials. Rather than be just another white woman (with all of the actual privilege that entails), Rachel gets to be a special Black/White/Indian/Artist/Bisexual/”Single Mother” snowflake who gets sympathy from the devotees of racial/sexual collectivism.

Which dovetails nicely into the second point: hijacking black oppression. White women have been very good at hijacking black people for their own purposes, and not just recently, but going back to Abolitionism. After the Civil War, and the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, the First Wave Feminists, some of whom had been abolitionists, hijacked abolitionist language and utilized it in their own cause, comparing white women to black slaves. What makes the usage of abolitionist rhetoric so fantastically absurd is that these same feminists, when denied a Constitutional Amendment conferring voting privileges on women, not only turned against black people with all of the viciousness that the gentler sex could muster, but aligned themselves with the burgeoning Ku Klux Klan and other organizations dedicated to the suppression of black people, appealing to them to protect the sanctity of white womanhood against the newly-enfranchised black men. That is a pretty fantastic claim, but it is as true as it is fantastic:

“Mr. Douglass talks about the wrongs of the Negro; but with all the outrages that he to-day suffers, he would not exchange his sex and take the place of Elizabeth Cady Stanton.”

-Susan B. Anthony

“You have put the ballot in the hands of your black men, thus making them political superiors of white women. Never before in the history of the world have men made former slaves the political masters of their former mistresses!”

-Anna Howard Shaw

“The enfranchisement of women would insure immediate and durable white supremacy, honestly attained, for upon unquestioned authority it is stated that in every southern State but one there are more educated women than all the illiterate voters, white and black, native and foreign, combined. As you probably know, of all the women in the South who can read and write, ten out of every eleven are white. When it comes to the proportion of property between the races, that of the white outweighs that of the black immeasurably.”

-Belle Kearney

“What will we and our daughters suffer if these degraded black men are allowed to have the rights that would make them even worse than our Saxon fathers?”

-Elizabeth Cady Stanton

“The white men, reinforced by the educated white women, could ‘snow under’ the Negro vote in every State, and the white race would maintain its supremacy without corrupting or intimidating the Negroes.”

-Laura Clay

“White supremacy will be strengthened, not weakened, by women’s suffrage.”

-Carrie Chapman Catt

Fast forward to the 1960s. The first wave feminists achieved the goal of suffrage and died a bloody death on the hill of Prohibition. Their successors in interest, the second wave feminists, looked at the legal victories that the NAACP was winning and said “we can do that.” They looked at Jim Crow and said “well, sure you have Jim Crow LAWS against you, but we have the Patriarchy against us, which is totally worse. But the Patriarchy is against you too, so you should support feminism.” See Casey Hayden and Mary King, who left the SNCC when they realized they could not herd black men into the feminist stockade. The second wave feminists even elbowed their way into the Civil Rights Act of 1964 with the help of (drumroll please) a racist white man. Representative Howard W Smith of Virginia, erstwhile foe of civil rights for black people, had no problem with offering an amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that included “sex” as a protected class against discrimination. In fact, Howard Smith supported sex as a protected class from discrimination since 1945 and had, for 20 years unsuccessfully sponsored the Equal Rights Amendment (for white women).

In Rachel Dolezal, I see a woman who was so thoroughly unhappy with her identity, who couldn’t distinguish herself from the herd as a white woman, so she put on some spray tan (I guess shoe polish or charcoal would have been a bridge too far), kinked up her hair, and put on a performance that black people just ate up and white people said “she’s black, but not too black. We’re comfortable with her.” I also see a white woman replaying a theme in America’s history of white women shamelessly using black people to satisfy her own goals, specifically power, validation, and attention.

Leah Morrigan: Women At Clubs Are Bitches. Men Are Responsible For This

Men’s image consultant (whatever that is), Leah Morrigan, laments that somehow, men have not only ruined women, but dating in the modern world. How is this? Let’s find out.

S., one of my clients who prefers to remain unnamed, is a well-dressed, successful 40-year-old financial professional who owns his own house and car. In less than two years, he’s worked hard with a personal trainer and lost 70 pounds. One might think he’d have luck with women with all of these things going for him but after a year of clubbing, he’s still single and still looking.

First mistake: Expecting to find a satisfying, non-emasculating relationship with the modern Canadian or American woman. Expecting to find a good woman in a club, the contemporary Church of Female Vanity, is like shaking the Slut Tree and expecting a wife to fall out.

 On weekends, he goes to downtown clubs in the hopes of meeting women. Here, he says, women expect attention, free drinks, and ego validation with the option to brush the guy off. He told me horror stories of his and his friend’s attempts to strike up conversations with women, often received with rudeness, humiliating responses, and in one case, a blood-splattering punch to the jaw.

Dance, puppet! Dance! I reiterate, unless you’re just out to get your dick wet, looking for true love at the club is an exercise in futility. And expecting women to react to your supplicating gifts with any sort of respect, grace, or even civility gets you the aforementioned rudeness, humiliation, and “a blood splattering punch to the jaw” (or first degree assault, if it were a man doing it).

If men receive this kind of treatment from women just by speaking to them, it’s understandable how they could grow bitter and frustrated, though some become downright hateful. Embittered by their experiences, a few have made businesses out of their hate-on for women and encourage other men to channel their anger and treat women as non-humans; commodities to be consumed — but without taking stock in themselves.

And the Feminist buzzword is expertly deployed: bitter. “OMG! You’re so bitter! How dare you take from your experience that women are anything but perfect angels, worthy of your attention, free drinks and ego validation? And worse, how dare you talk about it with other men? You should just sit in the corner and suffer in silence, you misogynist creep!”

 The more well-known “pickup artists” include Julian Blanc, known to Emma Teitel in MacLean’s as a “sophomoric ass” who incites violence against women in his teachings to awkward men to get them laid. Then there is Men Going Their Own Way, or MGTOW, an online men’s community that supports “a statement of self-ownership, where the modern man preserves and protects his own sovereignty above all else.” I was delighted to find this site until I read further and found that what began as masculine empowerment quickly turned vile. The founder, known as Sandman, sits safely behind his computer screen and proclaims his bitter, indiscriminate hate towards women, according to his videos I’ve watched. Sandman says that all women are manipulative whores and liars; he slut-shames, fat-shames, and age-shames women, and ironically complains about being single.

I must confess, I missed the whole “pickup artist” bandwagon, but I do not comprehend how “pickup artists” talking women into having sex with them qualifies as “violence.” But then, I’d sooner bite through my tongue than beg for sex, which is what pickup artists do, just in a more efficient way. But I did have a good belly laugh at Leah’s analysis of Men Going Their Own Way, and her summary coronation of the Youtuber Sandman as King of the MGTOWs. Sandman is no more the “founder” of MGTOW than former President James Buchanan or Nikola Tesla, or Isaac Newton, or Jesus, is the “founder” of MGTOW and according to those who claim to be MGTOW, it isn’t a hierarchy, or a movement, or an organization. They are just various men of different ages, races, and backgrounds who chose to act in their own self-interests and not sacrifice themselves for a society or group of women who clearly don’t respect them (you know, but treating with rudely, humiliating them, or giving them a “blood splattering punch to the face).

Though still feeding the feminine obsession, not all of these kinds of sites are about female manipulation. I came across a site that encourages men to examine who they are before attempting to approach women (what a concept!). The Attraction Institute says that men can still be free, still be themselves, and meet women who like men for who they really are, instead of pretending to be someone else worried about whether or not the thin façade can be maintained. Sounds more realistic but sites like these are few and far between.

Yes, the Attraction Institute, for the low price of $360, they’ll teach you how to be the sort of man who gets a gold star from the ladies at the club, but still like you for who you really are! Meanwhile, Leah rather comically misses the point of the aforementioned MGTOWs and their Holy Pontiff, Sandman. These men aren’t necessarily bitter (though I fail to see how “bitterness” or bad experiences translates to an inability to tell the truth). They’ve come to that harsh realization that there’s more to life than acquiring pussy.

But I do agree with the Attraction Institute in one respect: Hookers are cheaper than dates.

 It’s important to consider perspective here. Men may not consider the tricky social position women find themselves in: we’re the targets of constant male attention, desire, and sometimes aggression. This puts us into a state of defensiveness (self-preservation) or what Blanc calls the “bitch sheild.”

There’s a lot wrong with these three little sentences. First, Leah characterizing herself as, as a woman, as the “target” of male attention smacks of wishful thinking. Second, the word “target” itself. Why target? Target suggests that male attention is an attack, an act of violence, that men are always the active party, the aggressors, in sexual attraction, and women are always the passive, unsuspecting victims of the evil males. Synonymous with “target” is “prey”, “game”, “quarry”, and “kill.” Why not “recipient”? Or beneficiary? Or even receiver? I guess male attention is only welcome when accompanied by “free drinks” and “ego validation.”

We’re not bragging, but we know that men will always want us and we usually have the choice whether to couple or not, especially if we’re good-looking. Why? Because society is preoccupied with what women look like and this must have a massive influence on the human psyche. In the Kardashian-styled age of the egotistic selfie and the popularity contest that is social media, there is pressure and an expectation to be beautiful and sexy/self-absorbed and narcissistic. This, and the influence of media that seems to reward and normalize bitch behaviour can create legions of women who say, Yeah, I’m all that, and you have to work for it.


This is not natural, it is learned.

Leah is right, men will always want women more than women want men. Biology is a bitch like that. From the time a man turns 13 until his 50s, his body is screaming at him “REPRODUCE!” You should thank men for their tireless effort to propagate the human race. Men care what women look like, but only to a point. The bar for male attraction to women is relatively low, which is why men will have sex with women who are indisputably fat, ugly, stupid, crazy, or some combination of the four. Women are more preoccupied with what women look like than men will ever be, or specifically “how dare that bitch look better than me! I hate her!”

But Leah, rather than telling women to rise above society (*cough*WOMEN*cough*) and its pressures, she makes excuses for why women get to be self-absorbed, egomaniacal, narcissistic, wannabe-Kardashians. Women don’t have moral agency. They are just puppets dancing on the strings of society, and the media, and dare I utter that most evil of names, The Patriarchy.

With a touch of bitterness, S. now takes satisfaction in rejecting women himself, to “give them a taste of their own medicine.” Sounds like a war that no one will win.

In the end, like attracts like, so I say, imagine your equal; be realistic and take an objective look at yourself. What do you have going for you? Have you made an effort to look as good as she does? What could you improve? Ask yourself where your equal/cool, down-to-earth women would hang out — would it be in a nightclub?

If society eased up on its pressure for people to couple, I don’t think we’d be having this conversation. This social expectation keeps people frustrated and unhappy, so why do we allow it? If we ditch the idea and free ourselves from the pressure, maybe there will be fewer pickup artists, less gender violence, and fewer frustrated single men.


Once again, men are leading the way. S isn’t waging a war with women. He’s withdrawing from the war entirely, which is the best strategy when faced with a war you cannot win and a cause that isn’t worth fighting for. Leah’s so-called “pressure to couple” that “society” places on people is a pressure that women place on men, specifically, the pressure to commit to a single woman, and especially as a woman gets older and finds herself the recipient of less male attention, fewer free drinks, and no ego validation. Single men are slowly realizing that there is little satisfaction to be found in women, outside of the realm of sex and that true satisfaction is found in themselves and their own interests. Despite Leah’s appeal that single men continue digging through the bitch haystack for that “equal/cool, down-to-earth woman” needle, more men, the MGTOW men are saying “fuck it, life is too short to put up with your crap. I’m going golfing.”

Bitches Be Tripping-The White Girl Edition: Starring Tess “Moby Dick” Holliday and Stephanie “Safe Space” Clattenburg

I read two unrelated stories today, had two Coronas, and suddenly, magic happened. Like when a Buddhist monk suddenly attains oneness with everything, I obtained awareness of certain higher truths that exist transcend matter and spirit. Like the Tao, this truth cannot be fully explained to those lacking in awareness, just as one cannot describe color to a blind man. The best I can explain it is this:

(White) Bitches Be Trippin.

Story #1 – Tess Holliday

I’ll forego the long and sorry story of Tess Holliday and summarize: She is a big, fat, tattooed female and Instagram “model.” So far, no evidence exists that she sells sex for money like 98% of the other Instagram models. But the truth is out there.

Anyway, here’s the money quote from this beer keg shaped bitc..WOMAN:

According to The Guardian, a middle-aged African American man ‘said something appreciative’ when he walked by Tess, prompting her to ask: ‘What do guys think they’ll achieve by yelling something? They’re like: “She’ll love this, I’ll definitely get her number.”’

The article went on to say that with ‘some satisfaction’ Tess added: ‘I do admit that black men love me. I always forget that, and then I come to a black neighborhood and I remember.’


Which leads me to my first point: Black men, white women take your attraction for granted. They think your interest is a given, doesn’t matter if she’s 130 pounds or 300 pounds.


The incident in question occurred when I was on the street, feeling rather exposed in my underwear for the shoot, and an older black man cat called me as I was walking behind the team. I replayed the incident to the team once we were set up for the next shot, and jokingly said some semblance of what appeared in print. It was in relation to being cat called by black men significantly more than by white, but perhaps my tone and wording didn’t convey this clearly. It was also meant to play into the idea that black men like bigger women, but the humour of that doesn’t come through. To further add context, the team included two talented black women – so it was clearly not something intended to cause offence.


Woman attempts humor. Fails miserably. Film at 11. More importantly, surprise, surprise, what comes out of her mouth is not her fault. You see, the evil black man made her do it, just like those evil black men back in the 1920s and 30s would lead the pure, virginal white women to lives of sin and degradation with their jazz music and marihuana. There’s no way Tess could have laughed it off, ignored it, gone on about her business. Nope, she proceeds to call black men “thirsty.” And what’s worse is, she’s right. There is probably a gang of black men on Thirstagram who would gladly step over this land whale’s hipster boyfriend, peel back those ham curtains and try to fuck Tess. The issue here is not the “cat calling”/”street harassment” fantasy that most of these substandard feminists have. It’s not even the fact that a white person said “black people are like [fill in the blank].” The problem is, she uttered a disturbing fact, that black men do love her. And for that, black men need to hang their heads in shame. Black men need to stand up, and with a loud clear voice say, “not even with a stolen dick.”

Story #2-Stephanie Clattenburg

The star of this story, a videographer/camerawoman for the CBC, got hurt in her little hugbox when Snoop Dogg pointed out that she was “thick.” No, I’m not kidding at all. Here’s the interview. Her argument, at its base is, my feelings were hurt. “I felt embarrassed. I felt belittled. What is a compliment? It’s not exactly what he said, but how he said it. There was a bit of a power play. He wanted to embarrass me and he did. I turned beet red.”

What’s hilarious about this thing is, the chick is about burst into tears for a good 2 minutes. Appreciate this insanity. A famous black man, standing in front of her, calls her thick, and she damn near has a nervous breakdown. And she’s not even a good looking woman. Chopped hair, half-sleeve tat, emaciated, empty, flat eyes. Don’t worry Stephanie. I will never notice or compliment your body.

“Look at the shitter on that critter.” That’s my nigga Snoop Dogg, always got those fresh rhymes and verses for yo bitch ass.

Here’s the interview

The Intersection

So how do I tie all of this together? A crazy fat white woman and a crazy skinny white woman? The answer is black men. Here we have two major and competing ways that white women in the Anglosphere think of black men: On the one side, we have Ham Beast Tess, who takes black men’s sexual attraction as just a fact of life, a given, despite how badly she’s shaped. She knows that even if her hipster boyfriend falls off, she can always run out and pick up a black man who “likes’em thick.”

On the flip side of the coin, there’s Women’s Studies Exemplar Stephanie, who takes her lack of attraction to a black man’s sexual advances as an excuse to retreat to the padded cell. Stephanie has likely internalized the Feminist articles of faith, “1 in 3/4/5/42 women will be raped/sexually assaulted/have their feelings hurt at some point their lives,” “wage gap”, “patriarchy”, and “rape culture” and sees overt sexual interest from a man she’s not attracted to as the calm before the rape…I mean storm. And black men, who are advertised as being more forward with their sexual interests than men of other races, caused her Feminist programming to go haywire.

Black men, keep on watch for these two types of white women. The Tess Ham Beast who has no respect for you, and the Stephanie Feminazi who will either run off into the night crying, or fall to the floor screaming that you raped her with your words.