Black Matriarch Committed for Attempted Murder of Her Son; Released From The Funny Farm; Kills Her Granddaughter

Wig:

 

No Wig:

colton-grandmother

A California woman arrested Tuesday in the stabbing death of her 18-month-old granddaughter had a lengthy history of mental illness and became distraught late last year when she was separated from her young, special needs son, her relatives said.

But why? Who would be so heartless as to separate a loving mother from her “special needs son”?

Nicole Darrington-Clark, 43, was arrested a day after authorities said she stabbed her daughter and two young granddaughters at their home, killing one of them, then fleeing the grisly scene.

Oh, because she’s stabby. Black matriarchs don’t have to be mentally ill to be stabby. They do that when they are allegedly sane.

She was found in nearby San Bernardino and is being held on $1 million bail, police said.

Darrington-Clark has a history of mental health issues and was found not guilty by reason of insanity in the 2005 attempted murder of her own children and sent to a state psychiatric hospital.

Hey, you what would be best for society? Letting the crazy woman who tried to murder multiple people loose on society again.

California Uber Alles.

Her sister, LaShunda Clark, and father, Samuel Clark, said they were concerned about her well-being since her release but said she had seemed to improve before becoming distraught late last year when she was separated from her special needs son, who is now 5.

Since then, she had returned to live with her husband and son in Riverside County and had gone to visit her now-grown daughter and granddaughters Monday in Colton, her sister said, adding she did not know what triggered the attack.

Pause.

This woman is 43, was NGRI’d to the funny farm in 2005 for ATTEMPTED MURDERS, but somehow, somebody found it in them to fuck and impregnate a crazy, 37-year-old woman and pop out a slow kid?

Black men, DO BETTER. Fucking crazy bitches is a bad look all around.

“None of us has slept in the last two days. It has been terrible for our family,” LaShunda Clark said. “It was never anything about her trying to hurt us. I just don’t understand. We don’t know. We’re just asking God to just keep her safe.”

The San Bernardino County coroner’s division identified the girl killed as 18-month old Damani Trouter. The two wounded victims are hospitalized in stable condition.

Investigators do not know the motive for the attack, police Cpl. Ray Mendez said Monday. Police did not return calls seeking additional information.

Social services officials declined to comment in Riverside County, where LaShunda Clark said her sister had recently returned to live with her husband and young son.

I repeat, fucking crazy, stabby bitches is a bad look. Marrying crazy, stabby bitches is a bad look.

It wasn’t immediately clear when or why Darrington-Clark was released from the hospital.

In the earlier case, she pleaded guilty to stabbing her 14-year-old son and throwing her 10-year-old daughter out of a moving minivan in 2005. But a judge found Darrington-Clark not guilty by reason of insanity and sent her to a psychiatric hospital.

Crazy, stabby bitch has AT LEAST three kids and tried to kill two of them.

I repeat, fucking crazy, stabby bitches is a bad look.

Attorney Robert Sheahen, who represented her at that time, said she was diagnosed with schizophrenia and that Los Angeles County prosecutors had agreed with the judge’s decision.

“This is one of the greatest sadnesses I’ve ever encountered in my 40-year career,” he said Tuesday.

After certain point, this ceases to be sad and descends to the farcical. The Black Matriarch can do her level best to try and murder people and the government says “well, you didn’t successfully kill anybody this time, so, we’ll let you go if you promise to be good.”

A spokesman at the California Department of State Hospitals said officials can’t comment on individual cases.

At the apartment complex in Colton, about 60 miles (97 kilometers) east of Los Angeles, neighbor Tim Hill told the Press-Enterprise newspaper the wounded woman ran into his apartment Monday seeking help after the attack.

He said he ran upstairs to her apartment and saw the stabbed child and found her sister in the closet, shaking. Police decided they couldn’t wait for paramedics and took the girl to the hospital, Hill said.

Another neighbor, Patty Williams, told the newspaper that the wounded woman had been “stabbed everywhere.”

“I’m sad,” Williams said. “I feel like my soul left my body because this is disgusting.”

Patty, I’m not sad. The reason I’m not sad is because this stuff is predictable. There is a lot of untreated mental illness among Black people in America and it usually doesn’t get treated until someone commits some heinous crime.

Some people are leery of psychotherapy and I’m one of them. The Soviet Union amply demonstrated that psychiatry/psychology are potent weapons in the hands of tyrants. But some people really do need to be drugged out of their chemical imbalances or talked out whatever defects in their personality are leading them towards a cliff.

But, nobody is actually going to give a shit because when black people kill other black people, that’s just the Welfare-Penal State working the way it’s supposed to.

Source

Archived Source

Black Matriarch Burns Her Children’s Feet With Scalding Water

The Holly Hill Police Department reported responding to a possible child abuse complaint on April 10th, 2017.

Police met with an investigator who told officers that she was notified of a child suffering from serious burns due to exposure to hot water. The 22-year-old mother of the child, Sheretta Marie Harris, called the police on April 8th. She told the operator that the child had been burned from hot bathtub water during a diaper change. The child was transported to the Halifax Medical Center before being transferred to the Arnold Palmer Hospital for treatment.

The Child Protection Team Case Coordinator spoke with the Holly Hill Police Department to show them photos of the burn. Several layers of skin had been burned off. The burns were also isolated to the child’s feet, as reported.

A few days later on April 13th, officers met with representatives from the the apartment complex that Sheretta lived in. They all knew of the incident after receiving several reports. They went on to show police the room where two hot water heaters were kept. Typically, hot water heaters are set to the lowest temperature for safety reasons. However, after the incident was reported, the temperature was found turned up on the hot water heater. No one has access to these settings besides the maintenance manager and management staff. It is unknown who adjusted these settings, but the maintenance manager believes someone forced open the door and turned up the temperature.

On April 24th, Holly Hill Police Department officers met with Sheretta Harris, She retold her story, still saying that the hot water had burned her child’s feet while trying to clean up the dirty diaper mess.

Finally, on May 8th, it is reported that an officer spoke with an ex-roommate of Sheretta. He claims that he was personally told by Sheretta Harris that she intentionally put the child’s feet in scalding water because she was mad. He went on to tell the officer that Sheretta had intentionally broke her child’s arm a year ago but claimed it was from a stroller accident. He says that Sheretta becomes very violent when angry.

Two days later, the University of Florida Child Protection Team Preliminary Medical and Risk Assessment Report showed that the burns were done intentionally.

Sherretta Harris is being charged with Aggravated Child Abuse.

Question: If we can allegedly have “Post Traumatic Slave Syndrome” because of wrongs done to ancestors long dead, why can’t we have “Post Traumatic Black Single Mother Syndrome” because the woman who raised us did so by terrorizing and physically abusing us? (kind of like Massa used to!)

Source

Archived Source

Black Matriarch Murders Both of Her Children

A Dayton mom who reportedly shot two of her children is being held on $1 million bond.

Claudena Helton appeared in court for the first time since the May 18th shooting. Police say Helton told them she fatally shot them to save them from the “evils of the world”.

Her 8-year-old daughter Khmorra and 6-year-old son Kaiden died from their wounds Sunday.

In an affidavit, police say Helton made the admission during an interview with officers. Police also interviewed Helton’s other daughter, who told them her mom had shot her brother and sister and that she’d asked her to help carry them out of the house.

Municipal Court Judge Christopher Roberts set bond Monday at $1 million for Helton and scheduled a preliminary hearing for May 30. A public defender entered not-guilty pleas for Helton to charges of attempted murder and felonious assault.

The charges likely will be revised later because of the children’s deaths after her arrest.

Family members said Claudena Helton appeared to have mental issues stemming from an incident where her son reported being assaulted at school at the Boonshoft museum in 2015. A spokesperson for Montgomery County job and family services said Childrens Services had an open case and were working with Helton at the time of the shooting.

Source

Archived Source

The Billy Graham Rule and Self-Preservation

This puff-piece appeared on the Harvard Business Review website by Drs. W. Brad Johnson and David G. Smith, professors of psychology (mind-fucking) and sociology (Socialism) respectively. The article’s primary purpose to shill their new book, “Athena Rising: How and Why Men Should Mentor Women” (HA!), by excoriating who have enough wisdom to avoid putting themselves in compromising positions.

When U.S. Vice President Mike Pence said that he would never have a meal alone with a woman who was not his wife, he was invoking the well-worn “Billy Graham rule”; the evangelical leader has famously urged male leaders to “avoid any situation that would have even the appearance of compromise or suspicion.” Translation: Men should avoid spending time alone with women to whom they are not married. Graham has been known to avoid not only meals but also car and even elevator rides alone with a woman. The reason? To avoid tarnishing his reputation by either falling prey to sexual temptation or inviting gossip about impropriety.

Billy Graham also avoided handling the money of his ministry for the same reason. And guess what?

IT WORKED.

Have you heard of any scandals involving Billy Graham? Have you heard of Billy Graham doing meth or banging hookers? Have you heard of Billy Graham appropriating any unseemly amounts money from the ministry a la Creflo Dollar?

No, you have not because Billy Graham’s rule is successful.

Think Pence’s quarantine of women is unique? Consider a recent survey by National Journal in which multiple women employed as congressional staffers reported (and male colleagues confirmed) the existence of an implicit policy that only male staffers could spend time one-on-one or at after-hours events with their (male) congressmen. Cut out of key conversations, networking opportunities, professional exposure, and face time with career influencers, female staffers naturally are underrepresented in leadership positions and — not surprisingly — earn about $6,000 less annually than their male peers.

The Billy Graham — and now Mike Pence — rule is wrong on nearly every level. Lauded by some as an act of male chivalry, it is merely a 20th-century American iteration of sex segregation. When women are, in effect, quarantined, banned from solitary meetings with male leaders, including prospective sponsors and career champions, their options for advancement, let alone professional flourishing, shrink. The more that men quarantine women, excluding them from key meetings, after-hours networking events, and one-on-one coaching and mentoring, the more that men alone will be the ones securing C-suite jobs. The preservation of men and the exclusion of women from leadership roles will be perpetuated everywhere that the Billy Graham rule is practiced. Score another one for the old boys’ club.

Chivalry is not the issue. The issue is self-preservation, for your career and your mission. Billy Graham and his associates imposed the rule on themselves to protect the ministry they were building because they understood that they could not build a Christian ministry without the confidence of their parishoners that they were morally upright. And why? Because once a woman puts the mouth on a man, “He touched me/spoke to me/looked at me/paid me/etc.” that shadow hangs over him forever. See Casey Affleck, who can win an Oscar, but the rumor mill still churns up an eight-year old unproven accusation against him.

Let me put it even more plainly: If men do not choose to associate with women professionally, it is because women have become a professional hazard to men.

Whether codified or informal, sex quarantines are rooted in fear. At the heart of it, policies curbing contact between men and women at work serve to perpetuate the notions that women are toxic temptresses, who want to either seduce powerful men or falsely accuse them of sexual harassment. This framing allows men to justify their anxiety about feeling attracted to women at work, and, sometimes, their own sexual boundary violations. It also undermines the perceived validity of claims by women who have been harassed or assaulted. Although thoughtful professional boundaries create the bedrock for trust, collegiality, and the kind of nonsexual intimacy that undergirds the best mentoring relationships, fear-based boundaries are different. By reducing or even eliminating cross-sex social contact, sex segregation prevents the very exposure that reduces anxiety and builds trust.

A claim is not valid that is not supported by evidence or reason. But one has to love how the authors snuck that little attempt at creating an unjustifiable obligation. “A woman you don’t know what done wrong by a man who isn’t you; therefore you are obligated to give women you don’t know access to what you have, despite it being against your interests to do so.”

To build closer, anxiety-free working relationships with members of the opposite sex, thoughtful men will be well-served by having more, not less, interaction with women at work. In a classic series of studies, psychologist Robert Zajonc discovered that repeated exposure to a stimulus (such as a gender group) that previously elicited discomfort and anxiety helped reduce anxiety, and actually increased the probability of fondness and positive interaction. Termed the mere exposure effect in social psychology, the principle has been particularly useful in changing negative attitudes about previously stigmatized groups. Excellent leaders initiate positive developmental and collegial interactions with as many types of people as they can — deliberately, frequently, and transparently.

Can the “mere exposure effect” be applied to “rape” porn or even porn in general? Seems to being working in Japan.

Perhaps the most disingenuous and deceptive quality of the Billy Graham rule and other forms of sex segregation at work may be their superficially honorable and chivalrous nature. This “benevolent sexism” includes evaluations of women that appear subjectively positive but are quite damaging to gender equity. In their pioneering research on the topic, psychologists Peter Glick and Susan Fiske discovered that women often endorse many benevolent forms of sexism (e.g., that women are delicate and require protection, or that sex quarantines at work help preserve women’s reputations), despite the fact that the sexism inhibits real gender equality. This may explain why many women applauded Pence’s stance as evidence of his character and commitment to his marriage. But sexism always diminishes and disadvantages women at work; even benevolent sexist policies, which lack transparent hostility and appear “nice” on the surface, lead to lower rates of pay and promotion, regardless of how many women support them.

As pointed out above, the Billy Graham rule has little to do with “chivalry” and more to do with “CYA” (Cover Your Ass).

Here is something most men fail to consider when invoking sex quarantines at work: What does their unwillingness to be seen alone with a woman say about them and males more generally? When a man refuses to be alone with a female colleague on a car trip or in a restaurant, owing to fear of something untoward happening, we must ask: Dude, do you, or do you not, have a functioning frontal lobe? Sex quarantines reinforce notions that men are barely evolved sex maniacs, scarcely capable of muting, let alone controlling, their evolved neurological radar for fertile mates of the opposite sex. Sex quarantines paint men as impulsive, sexually preoccupied, and unable to refrain from consummating romantic interest or sexual feelings if they occur in cross-sex relationships. The “sex-crazed” male stereotype is often reinforced in the process of male socialization, and there are plenty of men who, at least on some level, fear breaking rank and violating these expectations of male behavior. This is where moral courage comes in. The fact is, many men choose not to fulfill this stereotype; many men have close, mutual, collegial relationships with women and never once violate a relational boundary.

This whole paragraph is a stunning piece of academic shaming language, the trust of which is “we will call you names (sex maniacs, sex-crazed) if you do not give us what we want. But if you show ‘moral courage’ (give us what we want), we will not carry out the threat that we claim you should fear.” This is emotional blackmailing with excess verbiage.

The frontal lobe, as my “dudes” referred to it, is where problem solving takes place. Women accusing men of bad acts is a hazard. The most cost-effective solution to a hazard is to go around it. Some men have chosen to bypass the hazard of a false accusation by bypassing the typical false accuser (a woman).

Simple, logical, and practical.

Of course, the Billy Graham rule and other efforts at quarantining women suffer from a number of logical inconsistencies. For instance, there is the efficacy problem: Rigid efforts to eliminate cross-sex interaction in the workplace have not proven effective. Even in the most conservative religious denominations, nearly one-third of pastors have crossed sexual boundaries with parishioners. Then there is the uncomfortable truth that the Billy Graham rule denies the reality of LGBT people and that sexual and romantic feelings are not limited to cross-sex relationships. The logic of sex quarantine thinking would dictate that a bisexual leader could never meet alone with anyone! Finally, the truth is that sex-excluding policies are rooted in deeply erroneous dichotomous thinking: Either I engage with women at work and risk egregious, career-threatening boundary violations or I avoid all unchaperoned interaction with women.

Sirs, did these pastors accept the Billy Graham rule? Did they practice it? If the answer to one or both of those questions is “no” then they cannot be held as examples of its inefficacy.

Thanks.

So what’s an evolved male leader to do? In the simplest terms, become what we call a thoughtful caveman. Healthy, mature, self-aware men understand and accept their distinctly male neural architecture. If they happen to be heterosexual, this means they own the real potential for cross-sex attraction without catastrophizing this possibility or acting out feelings of attraction, to the detriment of female colleagues. Thoughtful cavemen employ their frontal cortex to ensure prudence and wise judgment in relationships with women and men.

Is “thoughtful caveman” the latest colloquiallism for New Soviet Man New Feminist Man?

Translation: Give females things, don’t ask females for things you want (sex), and don’t worry about females accusing you of things because…why would a woman ever lie about sex?

Here is a final reason why even devoutly Christian men like Mike Pence and Billy Graham should be dubious about isolating and excluding women at work: Jesus himself was known to meet alone with women (e.g., the Samaritan woman at the well). It seems that showing kind hospitality and elevating the dignity of women was more important than any threat of gossip.

That’s funny.

The Samaritan woman attempted to trickle-truth Jesus (lie by omission). It is only after Jesus calls her out on her bullshit (You are right when you say you have no husband. The fact is, you have had five husbands, and the man you now have is not your husband. What you have just said is quite true.) that she SUBMITS to his authority as a Rabbi and as the Messiah.

Source

Archived Source

Hoes Gon’ Be Hoes: Featuring Nathalie Gordon

I haven’t done one of these in awhile. I hope I haven’t lost my touch.

Today’s subject is one Nathalie Gordon, recently featured in an Indy100 piece entitled “This woman perfectly summed up why men will never understand what it’s like to be female.”

According to her website, she’s some sort of advertiser/Social Justice enthusiast.

Alas, I was indiscrete. After re-tweeting her harrowing tale with some less than reverent comments, I was blocked.

So, I’ll just curate the tweets here, with commentary, for my amusement.

Oh boy! Nathalie is going to let her inner Ben Folds loose.

Let me tell ya’ll what it’s like, being female, middle-class and white

It’s a bitch, if ya don’t believe,

listen up for the new CD, sham on!

 

 

 

 

So, what we have here is a study in weak Day Game. No elevator pitch, no attempt to make her laugh, or develop a connection, he just tries to ply her with liquor in the hopes of getting the bang.

Again, this is a nope. Accusations are not how to counter a rejection. Calling a girl “rude” is to raise her shields and she won’t be receptive to anything else you might say because you’ve just called her rude, which heard as a “bad person.” You back up, reset, and try a different approach.

On the other side, a woman of a certain age usually knows how to handle unwanted male attention. She could have just told him, “Not interested in you, loser. Take a hike.” That would be the completely righteous answer because it is the honest truth. Saying, “I’m going to a meeting” might be truthful, but it’s not righteous. “I’m not buying what you’re selling. I don’t care if you’re funny, nice, rich, or you have a 12 inch schlong and a six inch tongue.” Righteous, unambiguous rejection.

And if the path of righteousness has no appeal, LIE! For most women, this is pretty easy. “I have a boyfriend” is older than the Code of Hammurabi; it might even be in a lost revision to the Code of Hammurabi. Don’t like that one? “I have four kids…with ADHD…and they sleep in the bed with me.” And if you feel the need re-enact the Cuban Missile Crisis and put the nukes on the table: “I have herpes.”

 

Maybe he needed some cornstarch for his genitals and laughed nervously because he got busted trying to stealthily relieve the itch.

 

An idea worthy of Einstein. Let the guy scratch himself, by himself and find another seat. GENIUS!

 

 

According to Glassdoor a bus driver pulls down, on average, £20,910. In real people’s money aka, US Dollars (I kid, British readers, I love you guys and your currency is superior to our Federal Reserve Monopoly money) that’s $27,147.45. This is not a lot of money, especially to demand someone initiate physical removal of a person from a third-party’s property. I don’t know the procedures of UK bus drivers, but here in America, our bus drivers have one job: DRIVE THE BUS. They call cops only if someone starts shit with them, or starts a physical altercation in the driver’s sight or hearing.

I do understand the cynicism of a low-ranked public servant. This bus driver has to see/smell/hear and chaffeur the dregs of humanity (or the salt of the earth, if you prefer), the frequency and volume of which depends on his assigned route. Here comes Nathalie, demanding that he involve himself in a non-issue that might require him to delay his route, which will get him shit on by his bosses, have to talk to the police, which will waste his time, write an incident report, which will waste more of his time, or, depending on the mental state of Nathalie’s public transportation paramour, get him injured or killed trying to “remove” the guy from the bus.

The bus driver, like Nathalie, is not being righteous. When he tells her “move to another seat” or “you’re a pretty girl, what do you expect” what he’s not getting at is, “your problem is not important to me, now suck it up and let me do my job without incident so I can go home.”

 

 

And here we get to the meat. Nathalie wants “respect” for women as a class, respect meaning a “feeling of esteem excited by actions or attributes of someone or something; courteous or considerate treatment due to personal worth or power.” Nathalie wants to be “esteemed” for no better reason other than she has a pair of breasts and a vagina.

I don’t respect all men because not every man walking this earth is respectable; additionally, my respect has value. Why should I give what is valuable to me to someone who does not DO anything to merit it? Merely existing does not make someone worthy of respect. Civility? Certainly. That’s the price of civilization. Courtesy? Maybe, depending on the person and setting. Respect? You have to actually do something to get that.

By your own logic, don’t you owe men, as a class, respect? After all, men and women are equal, and women are ENTITLED to “fucking respect” no matter who they are or what they look liek or what they are wearing. Therefore, men are also have an expectation of “fucking respect” no matter who they are or what they look liek or what they are wearing. So, yes, Nathalie, according to you, every woman on the planet does owe every man something: RESPECT.

 

Taken to it’s logical conclusion, Nathalie expects to “feel safe” sunbathing in a bikini in downtown Tehran during rush hour. When reality doesn’t meet you at the level of your expectations, who is in the wrong? Reality? Or you? Life is, unfortunately, an inherently unsafe enterprise. And when reality present you with unsafe circumstances, like living, you have two choices: adjust to reality until such time as you can alter your circumstances, or spit in reality’s face, proceed down the Primrose path of narcissistic delusion and take your chances with people who refuse to conform to script you’ve concocted in your head.

 

Yep. Loneliness and fear are purely female traits. No man will know what these feel like. Then again, if they are such bad things, why should we want to? Why should we empathize or sympathize with those burdened with such obvious weakness?

 

 

And we come to best part, the part where Nathalie binds your “morality” and “manhood” to servitude to her cause. Be on her side…even if she is in the wrong. Support her…even if she does not deserve support. Care…even if when she does not offer you caring in return. Listen…even if she is spouting irrational gibberish. Stand up for her…even if the person your standing up to harms or kills you.

Because, to Feminists, men aren’t people. As Nathalie pointed out, men are too degenerate to feel the full spectrum of emotions that a woman does or fully appreciate the existence of women, much as, in Christian eschatology, a man cannot fathom the mind or nature of God.

But thankfully, she can find some use for us as an “ally” (read: servant).

Twitter Archive

Black Women’s Idea of “Supporting” Black Men is Putting Themselves Over Black Men

Blogger Kiarra Sylvester posed a question: “Dear Black Men: We Black Women Have Your Back — Why Don’t You Have Ours?” So it’s a pretty typical piece of writing that does not address any grievance that black men might have.

Well, let’s just go over it.

“Can black men not be the white people of black people?”

Yeah, white people are pretty crappy aren’t they?

Because…EQUALITY…and…LOVE…and…TOLERANCE.

That was the eye-raising comment on my Facebook timeline one day that made me stop everything I was doing to follow along because there was so much truth in it.

Sorry folks. It has to be done.

For the most part, this is a forbidden topic for black women. The world already hates black men enough for the both of us, so we try to keep any issues we have with them to ourselves.

To be the black woman who speaks down or holds our male counterparts accountable is to be brave.

A black woman keeping issues to herself? I must have imagined all of those episodes of Donahue, and Oprah, and Wendy Williams, and Ricki Lake, and Jerry Springer, and Maury Povich, and Steve Wilko, the general thrust of which is black women going on TV declaring that black men ain’t shit, black men are on the DL, black men aren’t educated, black men ain’t on my level, et cetera ad nauseum.

True to double standards black men are, however, free to attack black women’s character and the smash our collective esteem into millions of pieces.

I just want to point out that she has identified black women as a collective. Therefore when I criticize black women as a collective, it is only because she, like so many other black women, opened the door.

I’m not sure how it looks from the outside looking in, but from the inside, it’s easy to see that black men are one of the most toxic, hateful and demeaning groups … to their own community … but black women especially.

Yep, black men sure do suck, don’t they? Quick question: Who raised most of these black men?

Single black mothers, perhaps? Interesting.

For centuries, black women have been the spine that helped to hold black men up as they walked into the world that feared their beauty, their glory, and their history (before slavery we were Kings and Queens!).

We Wuz Kangz n shit!

I’m embarrassed every time I hear this shit uttered, because it’s more mythical than factual, and black people don’t need any more myths.

The heroin epidemic, Bill Clinton’s 1994 crime bill, police brutality, and generally deadbeat black men are all to blame for the dramatic decrease of men remaining in black households.

You forgot LBJ’s Great Society (you know the one where he promised to have those n*ggers voting Democrat for the next 100 years), wherein he offered black women free food and free housing for them and their offspring through welfare and AFDC so long as she exiled the black man from the house.

And many black women took that devil’s bargain because the State is ultimate alpha male.

Black men must start to realize that the system is rigged against them — that mean there no room for error — not even for the pettiest of crimes.

Yes, and black women are willing agents of that system that is rigged against them. Black women have benefited and prospered in “The System”, as many of you gleefully point out to us when black women crow about their sheepskin diplomas obtained in “The System” their do-nothing jobs in “The System,” the billions they give to “the System” much of it to not look like black women.

One can work against a system from the inside, but black women don’t work against the alleged “System” either from the inside or the outside.

But I’ll tell you what the solution isn’t: The solution isn’t blaming black women’s independence for your woes.

Black women is strong and independent and don’t need no man. Got it.

Black women are known for their strength and ability to adapt; that’s what we’ve had to do in order to ensure the survival of our families while our men were away whether they were sold off to another plantation, killed, or imprisoned.

(Black) Women Are Wonderful. Got it.

Although black men’s anger and aggression are taken out on us every day, I think on an unconscious level black men are more upset with themselves for failing time and time again (hypothetically their belief, not my own).

(Black) Men Are Not Wonderful. Got it.

Black men have been forced to turn a blind eye while their women were raped and beaten, and then having to show a great level of respect to that very man — his wife’s rapist. (Yes, black men and women are still mentally impacted by the actions of slavery today.)

So…black men can be “mentally impacted” by things that happened over 150 years ago, but we can’t blame black women for the physical and mental abuse they subjected us to as children and adults about 15 years ago?

That makes perfect sense.

They point fingers and blame their lack of respect for black women on the way we carry ourselves, instead of just learning to respect all women on a basic human level.

And that’s the standard: Men must “respect” ALL women, no matter what vile shit they do. Meanwhile, women have the right to cut men down to their testicles for being “unworthy” of her.

So it’s no surprise that we’ve statistically been deemed the least desirable race of women to date despite being the fastest growing group of entrepreneurs.

Men are not women; men are sexually aroused by women’s asses, not their assets. Black female narcissism is just out-of-control.

“If I’m aroused by entrepreneurship, then men will be aroused if I’m an entrepreneur!”

No. Not even a little bit.

And, if you talk to a black man and ask him why he dates white women he’ll tell you that this is why.

How a dare a black man not want to fuck someone who is constantly seeking to one-up him! He gets to go out and compete against the rest of the world for a living, then when he comes home, he gets two options:

Becky: How was your day? Tell me all about it.

Keisha: You only made $1000 today? Nigga please! I made $1500! Get on my level! You ol’ punk, pussy ass nigga! That’s I fucked your best friend!

Yeah, it’s a little dramatic, but it is true. Will a white woman look to better deal a black man? Of course she will. The difference between the white woman and the black woman is that the white woman is not a constant struggle. Becky with the good hair will allow you to have peace in your house without a daily fight to assert your dominance.

Our independence and opinionated nature are said to be the culprit as to why our own men don’t want us, and I suppose they took this as an opportunity to corrupt us for the other races of men who might think otherwise.

And still, a majority of black women hold an unwavering love for and desire to be with black men — deeply flawed and all — we remain your number one fans.

Yep, black women are black men’s number one fans and hold unwavering love for black men, all while constantly telling black men how unworthy they are of black women’s love and much better black women are.

Black women want to be competitors with black men instead of companions to black men.

Why don’t black men have black women’s backs the way black women have black men’s?

Because unlike black women, black men are not constantly looking for a soft spot to put the knife.

Source

1984 Meets Feminism: 7 Reasons Why OLDTHINK Is Bad (and BIG BROTHER is Good) for Men

No matter where you look in our country’s culture and our current events, CLASS ENEMY dominance can be—well—quite overbearing.

OLDTHINK – which is a system that privileges CLASS ENEMIES and CRIMETHINK as better than and more respected than women, non-binary people, and femininity – permeates nearly every aspect of our lives.

Although OLDTHINK is set up in a way to benefit CLASS ENEMIES, it can also hurt CLASS ENEMIES in many ways, as CLASS ENEMIES are under the constant scrutiny of the fabricated norms that OLDTHINK has put in place.

What many CLASS ENEMIES don’t like to admit, or maybe even don’t know, is that a lot of what GOODTHINK represents can directly affect the harm that OLDTHINK cause for CLASS ENEMIES.

Below are seven ways that OLDTHINK actively (or passively) hurts CLASS ENEMIES, and how GOODTHINK can actually help CLASS ENEMIES move past OLDTHINK in order to achieve BELLYFEEL that isn’t hindered by WRONGTHINK.

1. Reflectiveness

As we’ve talked about in other articles at TBINAA, there are certain aspects to the norms of CRIMETHINK that make CLASS ENEMIES UNBELLYFEEL BLACKWHITE.

A troubling aspect of upholding CRIMETHINK is that CLASS ENEMIES don’t often BLACKWHITE, let alone how their UNGOOD affect others.

Rather than CONFESSING or GOODTHINKING, CLASS ENEMIES are told to “man up” or “stop being a p-ssy” in order to protect their precious CRIMETHINK, even if it means upholding UNGOOD that negatively affect those around them – and inevitably, themselves.

GOODTHINK turns that idea of WRONGTHINK on its head.

What many PARTY MEMBERS advocate for is all people, especially CLASS ENEMIES, being more GOOD, and BELLYFEEL being DENOUNCED for CRIMETHINK.

A big part of GOODTHINK is understanding how one’s actions and beliefs affect others, which patriarchal CRIMETHINK systematically avoids by upholding a more individualistic and man-versus-world mentality.

This aspect of GOODTHINK, especially as it has evolved in recent years, can help CLASS ENEMIES BLACKWHITE that keeping up CRIMETHINK or WRONGTHINK is something that not only make others UNBELLYFEEL, but can directly UNGOOD those they love or care about the most.

2. Competition

One of the most UNGOOD aspects of the CRIMETHINK is the tendency for CLASS ENEMIES to be in constant competition with each other. Almost every aspect of many CLASS ENEMIES’s lives is shrouded by the need to see themselves as better than other CLASS ENEMIES, or other people in general.

This includes physically, such as PHYSICAL JERKS for the specific intent of having bigger muscles, better abs, or more strength than other CLASS ENEMIES, or intellectually, where CLASS ENEMIES will UNGOOD to PROLES, even if the PROLES they’re talking to are more knowledgeable on the topic than they are.

So much of the actions CLASS ENEMIES take and the way CLASS ENEMIES think are related to UNGOOD.

It’s a much different story in the world of GOODTHINK. Despite the many stereotypes of PROLES being highly competitive with each other, GOODTHINK has evolved around the notion of GOOD – and these are crucial to achieving BELLYFEEL.

It is much more important for PARTY MEMBERS to create GOOD community of GOODTHINKERS than it is to UNGOOD.

PARTY MEMBERS are much more interested in creating GOOD for as many people as possible.

This can be beneficial for many CLASS ENEMIES who have trouble BLACKWHITING without feeling the need to be better than them – they can find a way to truly separate themselves from the competition that surrounds them every day.

3. Status Quo

It’s human nature for people to not like change.

We like to BELLYFEEL, and we don’t like it when something comes along and puts us out of BELLYFEEL. We will find a way to BELLYFEEL, often at any and all costs.

Unfortunately, this is exactly what OLDTHINK does for CLASS ENEMIES.

It enables CLASS ENEMIES to BELLYFEEL while never having to BLACKWHITE.

For CLASS ENEMIES, it’s easier to find partners who will do all of the things that CLASS ENEMIES “aren’t supposed to do.” Although times have changed, many CLASS ENEMIES still feel as though they are meant to be the main moneymakers in their household, while their partners should be the ones staying home, making them dinner, doing their laundry, taking care of their children, and so on.

BIG BROTHER seeks to get rid of OLDTHINK, of what it means to be a “real man” or a “real woman.” PARTY MEMBERS would rather dismantle UNGOOD and create GOOD.

What CLASS ENEMIES don’t realize is that allowing themselves to fall into the trap of patriarchal CRIMETHINK is not only UNGOOD, but it’s also hurting themselves by not allowing them to BELLYFEEL.

What many PARTY MEMBERS would rather see is CLASS ENEMIES working alongside them to break down UNGOOD and BELLYFEEL.

4. Hierarchy

Similar to the notion of WRONGTHINK, CLASS ENEMIES often don’t realize how our society is built to put them ahead of PROLES.

EMMANUEL GOLDSTEIN has supported this notion that CLASS ENEMIES are inherently better than others, simply by virtue of being a CLASS ENEMY. Even if you identify as a CLASS ENEMY, if you don’t play along with the norms of OLDTHINK, you’re treated as an “other” as well.

More importantly, though, we see where CLASS ENEMIES are put on a pedestal while others fall by the wayside. Typically, CLASS ENEMIES are paid more, CLASS ENEMIES are offered jobs more often, CLASS ENEMIES pay less for products, CLASS ENEMIES aren’t subjected to UNGOOD, and are content with this and so much more staying the same.

Unfortunately, PROLES usually don’t have those same options, and they’re forced to UNBELLYFEEL on a daily basis.

The solution that BIG BROTHER has developed for this is leveling the playing field. That doesn’t mean CLASS ENEMIES should have to deal with UNGOOD. Rather, CLASS ENEMIES should both GOODTHINK and also BLACKWHITE, since much of it is perpetuated by CLASS ENEMIES in the first place.

PARTY MEMBERS strive first and foremost for GOOD.

While striving for GOOD and giving up UNGOOD sounds scary for a lot CLASS ENEMIES, it actually presents an opportunity for CLASS ENEMIES to put their effort into creating a society where PROLES don’t automatically fear CLASS ENEMIES, especially cisgender CLASS ENEMIES.

5. Ignorance

Although OLDTHINK benefits all CLASS ENEMIES in one way or another, it doesn’t support all CLASS ENEMIES in the same ways. This is one of the illusions that EMMANUEL GOLDSTEIN tries to pull though: You’re a CLASS ENEMY, you’re better than PROLES, and definitely better than non-binary PROLES.

But what if you’re a black CLASS ENEMY as opposed to a white CLASS ENEMY? Or a poor CLASS ENEMY as opposed to a rich CLASS ENEMY? A trans CLASS ENEMY, a disabled CLASS ENEMY, an undocumented immigrant CLASS ENEMY, or an uneducated CLASS ENEMY as opposed to a cis CLASS ENEMY, an able-bodied CLASS ENEMY, a male citizen, or an educated CLASS ENEMY?

What EMMANUEL GOLDSTEIN wants CLASS ENEMIES to believe is that these other factors of race, ability, class, and so on, don’t matter – that all CLASS ENEMIES are equal – while he also supports UNGOOD that oppress people who aren’t white, rich, able-bodied, cisgender, or any combination of traits that are considered the “norm.”

BIG BROTHER, especially more recently, is focused on looking at everyone’s experiences through a lens of GOODTHINK. This means that as opposed to just looking at someone as a CLASS ENEMY, they recognize that CLASS ENEMY as also being black, disabled, and poor, for example.

GOODTHINK allows for BLACKWHITE that affect a person.

While the focus of BIG BROTHER is often primarily on gender, GOODTHINK with an emphasis on intersectionality can help CLASS ENEMIES and PROLES alike understand where they are most negatively affected, how they experience various forms of UNGOOD, and what they can do to eradicate UNGOOD.

6. Rape Culture

There is no logical or reasonable way to deny that we live in a society that UNGOOD.

AIRSTRIP ONE has been historically set up in a way that makes UNGOOD not only possible, but a normal, expected occurrence for many people.

For CLASS ENEMIES, it’s seen as a necessity to seduce PROLES (or other potential sexual partners) to the point that they’re encouraged to UNGOOD.

When CLASS ENEMIES are questioned about UNGOOD, it often gets played of as “boys will be boys,” or “uncontrollable sexual urges,” or “nothing that serious.”

For the survivor, however, they are often treated horribly, with outsiders calling them “sluts,” saying “they deserved it” or they were “asking for it” for one reason or another, and inevitably removing responsibility from the CLASS ENEMY who committed the UNGOOD.

And it goes beyond direct physical encounters too of course, with how PROLES are objectified in every form of media, or how children and teenagers are sexualized to the point that they’re kicked out of class for clothing that’s deemed “too sexy,” so on and so forth.

A recent focus of BIG BROTHER is completely ridding our society of EMMANUEL GOLDSTEIN. BIG BROTHER is focused on changing OLDTHINK, providing CHOCORAT – including CLASS ENEMIES – who have been affected by EMMANUEL GOLDSTEIN, and DENOUNCING OLDTHINK.

BIG BROTHER is out to protect everyone from EMMANUEL GOLDSTEIN by making sure he can not only be talked about more openly, but he can also be more openly DENOUNCED.

Ultimately, that means breaking the patterns that lead CLASS ENEMIES to think that manipulating, hurting, or raping people is okay, and having CLASS ENEMIES BLACKWHITE and understand why PROLES just don’t trust CLASS ENEMIES in many situations.

7. Toxicity

What all of this comes down to is the simple fact that the CRIMETHINK that OLDTHINK has bred and enabled is DOUBLEPLUSUNGOOD. It makes everything DOUBLEPLUSUNGOOD, but it also makes things worse for CLASS ENEMIES who benefit from it because they don’t BLACKWHITE.

CLASS ENEMIES are hurt by their own dedication to CRIMETHINK by allowing themselves to hurt others.

While some CLASS ENEMIES have definitely distanced themselves from THOUGHTCRIME, most CLASS ENEMIES are just fine staying in those positions – and they’ll defend it no matter what, because they’re BELLYFEEL.

Even so, just distancing themselves from CRIMETHINK isn’t enough. CLASS ENEMIES have to work to CRIMESTOP, and DENOUNCE other CLASS ENEMIES who DUCKSPEAK, who are acting in ways characterized by body terrorism.

This is one of the goals of INGSOC: to enable CLASS ENEMIES to be less UNBELLYFEEL and be more BLACKWHITE.

But GOODTHINK is also important for CLASS ENEMIES to achieve a level of BELLYFEEL that OLDTHINK doesn’t allow in any way.

CLASS ENEMIES have to be more willing to BLACKWHITE, while also CRIMESTOP.

CLASS ENEMIES have to understand that you can’t separate gender from race, sexuality, ability, class, and other identities. CLASS ENEMIES have to be more GOODTHINKER-minded when it comes to treating others with respect, calling out CRIMETHINK, fighting for BIG BROTHER, and with BELLYFEELS.

It is pertinent to the betterment of our society that we can question ourselves, CRIMETHINK, and OLDTHINK.

Source