Good Cuck Project/Andy Grant: “I Sympathize With MGTOW. LOL/JK You’re A Bunch of Pseudo-Incel Potential Murderers.”

The Good Men Project (hereafter to be known as the Good Cuck Project) has had MGTOW in its crosshairs as a collection of wrongthinkers to be eventually purged for the approval of their feminist overladies. Alek Minassian’s less-than-safe driving in Toronto and prior Facebook vomiting has given them fresh gristle to chew over and attempt to smear people as ‘masculine terrorists.’

One of these drones desperate to protect the queen is Andy Grant, host of Real Men Feel on Youtube. After a ‘discussion’ (such as it was) with a Youtuber named MGTOW Universe about the topic (mistake) and several people becoming metabolically-challenged as a result of Mr. Minassian’s Wild Ride. Andy had this to say about MGTOW as a whole.

Talking with men who hide their faces and names made me feel like I was talking to terrorists.

Yeah, because feminists always behave so rationally and engage exclusively with your thoughts and beliefs. They don’t try to cost you your livelihood and exiled from civil society (James Damore, Jason Miller, Gregory Allen Elliot, Phil ‘Thunderf00t’ Mason, Jon Malin, Kevin Williamson, Jared Sakren, etc.)

Anonymity and Pseudonymity may be used for good (like many writers who have published things that ran contrary to the paradigm preferred by their social and political ‘betters’) or evil (the Black Bloc of Antifa, the White Knights of the KKK)

Prove our anonymity/pseudonymity is being used for evil. Use small words, if you would.

The few men who took the time to email me or engage in a conversation, I gained respect and understanding for.

Uh-huh. But?

Men who avoid women because of the perceived dangers of divorce, abuse allegations, losing their time, money, etc. to her are living in fear.

I occasionally go into the woods. I go to places where wolves and bears are present. I take steps to avoid said wolves and bears where I can, and bring measures to protect myself from them if avoidance or escape become impossible.

There is a difference between rational fear (being mauled by an animal, being falsely accused by a woman) and an irrational fear (agoraphobia).

The MGTOW men that I’ve spoken with recognize that their philosophy doesn’t serve society and that if all men took part, the human race would go extinct.

So? Après moi, le déluge.

When I saw a new story last week about the man who killed ten women in Toronto with a van, I wondered if that guy was going to be tied to MGTOW. He did identify himself as a member of Incel which doesn’t seem to be all that different from MGTOW when it comes to philosophy but does support more aggressive actions.

Which only demonstrates that you didn’t pay one iota of attention to any MGTOW who wasted their time speaking or writing to you.

The game is to be sold, not told, gentlemen.

It is a waste of time to try and reason with the bluepilled. Some kids need to burn their hands on the stove in order to learn not to touch it. Do not discuss MGTOW with people who aren’t with it.

In front of the bluepilled, MGTOW just means “Mass Gross Take-Off Weight” and nothing else.

If you want to know more see What Is an Incel? from the NY Times. The story referred to Southern Poverty Law Center – a name I often see in stories about hate groups. I decided to visit their site and search for MGTOW which resulted in this:

Fuck the SPLC. That is all.

If the MGTOW philosophy is only spread via angry, anonymous internet trolls, then I fear it is destined for hate group status.

Really? Based upon what? Your imagination?

Source

Advertisements

Black Panther: Killmonger Was Hitler

Muh Oppression

I can already hear an objection being formed in your furious little fingers about ‘muh oppression.’ ‘Only whitey can be an oppressor!’ ‘Whitey can never be oppressed!’ Et cetera, et cetera, blah, blah, blah.

Well, Hitler argued, quite successfully, that the German people were oppressed. His entrance into politics was spurred by the end of World War I and the myth of the ‘stab in the back,’ the notion that Germany could have won the war but for ‘betrayal’ on the homefront by Jews and Socialists. The truth is somewhat more complicated. The armistice and subsequent Treat of Versailles was demanded by the German High Command. The head of the civil government, Prince Max of Baden, didn’t know how bad the war was going because the military concealed the truth from him. The Social Democrats(Socialists) formed a republican government and signed the armistice and Treaty of Versailles to keep Germany out of the hands of the Bolsheviks. None of this mattered to Hitler, who condemned the Social Democrats as the ‘November criminals’ a label which stuck to them from 1923 to 1933 when the Nazis finally attained political power.

The danger of the oppressor/oppressed mentality is that it can be wielded by anyone and that it justifies every brutality imaginable, because it does not condemn a person for anything they have actually done; it condemns them for what someone else did. Killmonger murdered the museum curator with a smile because some white person somewhere did a thing in Africa and picked up a Vibranium pick axe.

The Water Fall Putsch

In 1923, the NSDAP was a small but rapidly growing provincial party in the German state of Bavaria. The Bavarian government and the national government had a falling out over the treaty of Versailles, reparation payments to the French, and the dictatorial powers assumed by the German army generals. Like any good socialist revolutionaries, the Nazis thrived in conditions of civil unrest and economic uncertainty. However, Hitler, inspired by Mussolini’s successful march on Rome, decided that the time had come for the Nazis to launch a ‘Putsch’ on the Bavarian government, which would then give them the resources to confront and force the national government to concede. The name Beer Hall Putsch comes from the Buergerbraukeller in Munich where the Nazis seized the leaders of the Bavarian government (and subsequently allowed them to escape) and declared their intentions to overthrow the national government. Or, as most people call it, treason. After the Bavarian state leaders got loose, they marshaled the state police and the Reichswehr to suppress the Nazis. By the time it was done, 16 Nazis and 3 policemen were dead, and Adolf Hitler was in custody awaiting a trial for treason that would, far from ending his ambitions, give him the biggest platform for National Socialism he had to that point.

Killmonger’s Water Fall Putsch went a little better for him. Replace the Bavarian state with the Border Tribe. Rather than try to overthrow them, Killmonger wins their leader with a nice little present that he’s been waiting 20 years to receive: the bullet-riddled corpse of Ulysses Klaw. Overjoyed at this thoughtful gift, W’Kabi promptly switched sides from Wakandan nationalism to Wakandan identitarianism and walked his new best friend Killmonger right into the royal palace. Then a half-naked fight happens and Killmonger becomes the new king.

So Hitler’s putsch failed. He would succeed later through electoral politics. Killmonger’s putsch succeeded, though its success would be short-lived.

The Wakandan Anschluss

This brings us to the most blatant similarity between Adolf Hitler and Erick Killmonger: the question of the Anschluss Osterreichs. Hitler, a native Austrian, wrote in that funny little book of his that one of his dreams was the union of all the German people into a Greater German state, an Osterreich, if you will. And the largest population of Germans in Europe outside of Germany itself were in Austria. Therefore, those Germans needed to united, or Anschluss’d, with Germany. And if you’re going to take half of a pie, you might as well take the whole thing, so, might as well Anschluss all of the non-Germans of Austria as well. But how to go about it? One way is to have allies in Austria. By 1936, a nice, healthy, National Socialist party was established in Austria. Propaganda, political pressure , lobbying, organizing, etc. were underway but the Germans were getting a bit impatient. So it was decided in Berlin that efforts would be undertaken to demonstrate to the Austrians just how serious the Nazis were about this Anschluss business. In 1937, a group of Austrian Nazis known as the Committee of Seven launched a campaign (secretly financed, armed, and directed by the Schutzstaffel) of bombings and violent demonstrations to weaken the position of the Austrian government. At the same time, the Nazis publically made it known that if Austria cracked down too hard on the poor oppressed Germans of Austria, they would send the Reichswehr over the border to protect the sanctity of German blood. This strategy worked fantastically and Austrian Chancellor Kurt von Schussnigg, meekly handed over Austria to the Nazis.

The same strategy would be repeated in Czechoslovakia in 1938 through the Sudeten German Party, and again in Poland of fomenting political unrest, covertly arming partisans loyal to Germany, and threatening military conflict unless Germany received concessions.

Killmonger never got past the first step, though he made no bones about the fact that he intended to arm ideologues, and likely those who shared his vision of a Black Anschluss with Wakanda at its center. Out of this unrest, Killmonger would likely have carried guerrilla war into open war, especially in the face of countries not inclined to submit to terrorism, no matter how much magical Vibranium the terrorists had. By this I mean America. The Europeans would bend over and grab their ankles faster than you can say ‘Heil Mein Schwarze Fuhrer.’

The Night of Long Spears

I’m proceeding along the movie’s timeline but jumping back and forth through the history of the Third Reich so I’m going to beg your indulgence if you get confused by me going from 1923, to 1938, then back to 1934. At the climax of the movie, there is this big battle between the Border tribe who are in Killmonger’s pocket because he presented them with the corpse of a dead white guy, and the strong, empowered women of Wakanda who are loyal to T’Challa. A similar schism and subsequent house-cleaning occurred in the Nazi Party in 1934. The Nazis had control of the Reichstag after the 1933 election, they didn’t have the loyalty of the officer corps Reichswehr. Ernest Roehm, a long-time Nazi, personal friend of Hitler, and leader of the S.A. or Brownshirts, took it into his head that the Stormtroopers ought to become the new German army, with him at its head. This did not sit well with the officers who were of old, noble blood and turned their noses up at letting the cabal of street-fighters, drunks, pimps, and homosexuals that comprised the leadership of the Brownshirts have any say in commanding the Reichswehr.

General von Blomberg, on behalf of the Army High Command made Hitler an offer that he couldn’t refuse: Get rid of Roehm, the S.A. commanders, and disarm the Brownshirts. In exchange, the Army would endorse Hitler to replace Hindenberg as President. With the offices of President and Chancellor, and the Reichstag under Nazi control, he would be the absolute ruler of Germany. A few dozen deaths in exchange for absolute power was a hell of a bargain.

June 30, 1934 has multiple names: Operation Hummingbird, the Roehm Putsch, the Blood Purge, and the Night of Long Knives. The outcome is what matters. Hitler dispatched Himmler’s S.S. to dispatch Roehm and all other ‘disloyal’ elements targeted for death or ‘schutzstaff’ (protective custody). By the end of the three day purge, 77 were dead and a thousand were taken to prisons or concentration camps. Germany was firmly in the hands of its fuhrer and would remain that way for the next 11 years.

Killmonger’s blood purge did not go as well. He intended to kill T’Challa’s family, along with anyone else who defied his plans to Anschluss all of the world’s blacks into his Wakandan Reich. His Border tribe loyalists were not as committed to his cause as the S.S. was Hitler and surrendered rather than continue fighting the T’Challa loyalists.

Ironically, Killmonger probably spilled more Wakandan blood in his brief reign than T’Challa or his father in the entirety of theirs.

Suicide

Hitler opted for suicide in the bunker rather than capture.

Killmonger blathered about ‘muh Middle Passage’ and stabbed himself in the chest rather than be tried and imprisoned by Wakanda. That’s a shame. I’m sure his version of Mein Kampf would have been an interesting read.

Conclusion

Black Panther is the struggle between nationalism and identitarianism. T’Challa and T’Chaka are nationalists. Their duty as kings was to protect the nation of Wakanda, which includes its land and the people within it. The Wakandans generally did not interfere in the affairs of other countries UNLESS it posed at existential threat to Wakanda and would not allow others to interfere in their affairs, hence the whole secrecy policy. Even the pursuit of Ulysses Klaw, while straining nationalism a bit, fit within it. Black Panther’s goal was to capture Klaw, snatch and grab, quick and quiet. He did not intend to capture any land for Wakanda, take any resources for Wakanda, or alter South Korean government to one more amenable to Wakanda. Nationalists comprehend national sovereignty of both their own nation and others.

Identitarians, on the surface, appear similar to nationalists. But they aren’t. The identitarian view is rooted in ideology rather than blood or borders or law. For identitarians, it’s not enough that you are black, or white or brown or a man or a woman or whatever; you must adhere to what identitarians perceive as ‘correct thinking.’ This ‘correct thinking’ always boils down to some perceived grievance with those not in the identitarian’s group. This grievance justifies whatever act the identitarian may take against an outside, and usually ‘oppressor’ group. This leads to the second part of the ‘correct thinking’: justification. Whatever the identitarian does to a person in an out-group or oppressor group is justified solely by being in that group.

This formula fits across identitarian ideologies. Hitler murdered a number of Germans, despite his talk about the sanctity of German blood and the greatness of the volk. Killmonger, by his own admission, murdered Africans, other black people, and Wakandans in his pursuit of the throne, Vibranium, and a war with the out-groups and oppressors.

T’Chaka tried to bring N’Joba back to Wakanda for trial. T’Challa tried to save Killmonger and put him on trial. Despite being a traitor in fact, N’Jobu’s Wakandan identity entitled him to the protection of Wakandan law.

Nationalists pursue civic tranquility because they value the lives and safety of people in their nation-state. Identitarians pursue civil war because they value no one’s lives, not even those of their supposed people, and will destroy anyone through internal or external conflict to achieve race/class/gender purity.

Nationalists deal with real people. Identitarians live in a utopian delusion baptized in the blood of its enemies.

Black Matriarch Murders Black Man For Walking Up On Her

A woman has been arrested in the stabbing death of Benjamin McKeel, 38, on New Year’s Eve in the 4900 block of Lorraine Street in Baton Rouge, police said.

Katrice Michelle Belezaire, 34, of 4949 Lorraine St., is accused of stabbing McKeel to death after an argument around 7 p.m.

Belezaire and McKeel were seen arguing before entering a home, and could be heard continuing to argue while inside, according to booking documents. Belezaire told deputies McKeel “walked up” on her, and she stabbed him. Deputies recovered the knife allegedly used in the stabbing, which she told them she placed on the counter afterward.

Belezaire was booked into East Baton Rouge Parish Prison on a count of second-degree murder.

McKeel not only ‘disrespeck’d’ Belezaire, but he had the nerve to ‘walk up on’ her.

Summary execution. Just another day in the black matriarchy.

Happy new year!

ProPublica Is Very Concerned That Females Are Charged With Filing False Reports

Ken Armstrong and T. Christian Miller of ProPublica, the propaganda arm of the Sandler Foundation (founded by Herb and Marion Sandler, the living embodiments of Honore de Balzac’s maxim “Le secret des grandes fortunes sans cause apparente est un crime oublié, parce qu’il a été proprement fait.”), have some thoughts on complaining witnesses in sex crimes cases. They’ve picked some instances when sex crimes witnesses were charged with filing false reports in support of “Listen and Believe.” This ignores that no person will ever do as much time for filing a false report as for being wrongfully convicted of rape, but we can’t let pesky facts disrupt the narrative.

There are many reasons for women to think twice about reporting sexual assault. But one potential consequence looms especially large: They may also be prosecuted.

For filing false police reports, which they should be if they are lying.

This month, a retired police lieutenant in Memphis, Tenn., Cody Wilkerson, testified, as part of a lawsuit against the city, not only that police detectives sometimes neglected to investigate cases of sexual assault but also that he overheard the head of investigative services in the city’s police department say, on his first day in charge: “The first thing we need to do is start locking up more victims for false reporting.” It’s an alarming choice of priorities — and one that can backfire.

This is a deceptive attempt at framing by Armstrong and Miller of the problems of the Memphis Police Department to get to the conclusion of ‘females aren’t listened to’ and ‘they don’t take rape seriously.’ This is a well-worn trick of advocacy types who take a fact and use it to draw a faulty conclusion, usually including some type of call to action.

The problem of the MPD is not that the department is full of evil, sexist men who hate females; their problem is one of crooked cops. Some are a little bent and don’t like actually doing police work. Those are the focus of Armstrong and Miller in this piece. Others are just crooks with badges. Those are the ones they ignore.

WREG in Memphis reported that the number of MPD officers arrested for criminal activity between 2011 and 2016 was 114. That’s a lot of dirty cops. It also lines up with a 2012 WREG news report in which then-Police Director Toney Armstrong described 20 arrests per year as being about normal for the MPD.

In short, the MPD has a problem with putting badges on people who probably shouldn’t have them. The types who put the badge on just to get a paycheck, to move up the ladder by massaging their clearance rates or arrest numbers, or worse, the ones who use the badge as a cover to commit to crimes.

In 2015 we wrote an article for ProPublica and the Marshall Project about Marie, an 18-year-old who reported being raped in Lynnwood, Wash., by a man who broke into her apartment. (Marie is her middle name.) Police detectives treated small inconsistencies in her account — common among trauma victims — as major discrepancies. Instead of interviewing her as a victim, they interrogated her as a suspect. Under pressure, Marie eventually recanted — and was charged with false reporting, punishable by up to a year in jail. The court ordered her to pay $500 in court costs, get mental health counseling for her lying and go on supervised probation for one year. More than two years later, the police in Colorado arrested a serial rapist — and discovered a photograph proving he had raped Marie.

What happened to Marie seemed unthinkable. She was victimized twice — first raped, then prosecuted. But cases like hers can be found around the country.

As can cases in which men were prosecuted for crimes they didn’t commit, like…rape? It sucks, doesn’t it? Not enjoying the protection of the law to which citizens are supposed to be due.

In Marie’s case, and with some of the other cases, the victims hadn’t acted the way the police thought a victim should act. Their affect seemed off, or they declined help from an advocate, or they looked away instead of making eye contact. As a result, their stories became suspect.

That’s terrible. But, as usual, I can do better.

Wilbert Jones, of Baton Rouge, LA, was recently freed after 45 years of imprisonment for the rape of a woman in 1971. The case was prosecuted entirely on the identification of Jones by the woman.

Listen and Believe, right?

The problem was, Jones didn’t do it. The prosecutor in Jones’ case withheld exculpatory evidence in his trial of another rape committed in an identical manner while Jones was in custody.

Marie was given a $500 fine. Jones spent 45 years in a Louisiana prison. Ruminate on which set of consequences you would rather suffer because a complaining witness was or was not ‘believed.’

In Lynnwood, the police have since changed the way they do things to prevent anything like Marie’s case from happening again. Detectives today receive additional training about trauma and cannot doubt a rape report absent “definitive proof” that it is false. In an effort to build trust, the department ensures that victims get immediate help from specially trained advocates. Those changes correspond with guidelines for rape investigations that sex-crimes experts have urged for police departments around the country. Those guidelines stress: The police should investigate thoroughly while reserving judgment. Evidence trumps assumptions. The police should be wary of stereotypes; they should not, for example, find an adolescent victim less believable than an adult. Some victims will be hysterical, others stoic; police should not measure credibility by a victim’s response. Police should not interrogate victims. They should listen.

If police don’t question witnesses, how will they get the facts necessary to gather evidence sufficient to argue probable cause for an arrest warrant?

Nationally, police departments, victim advocates and academics have experimented with ways to relieve the burden on rape victims who might fear dismissal, or even arrest, by reporting their attacks to the police. Perhaps the most influential campaign to change police procedures is known as Start by Believing, sponsored by End Violence Against Women International, an organization that conducts training for the police and victim advocates. The campaign asks participants to make a simple pledge: Start the process of investigation by believing those who come forward. Police agencies in nearly every state have joined up.

Or, as Saint Anselem of Canterbury wrote in Proslogion: Credo ut intelligam (I believe so that I may understand). This is all well and good if you are propigating theology, but it is a horrible concept for a judicial system that is supposed to be driven by evidence. It also flies in the face of Armstrong and Williams’ own facts. They stated that ‘Mary’ told her version of the story and then backed off on being questioned. She lied by contradicting what later turned out to be true.

The witnesses are lying.

Armstrong and Williams’ presented the deposition of Cody Wilkerson against the MPD as true, which accused certain cops in the MPD of lying about rape investigations and clearances.

The cops are lying.

I presented the case of Wilbert Jones who was wrongfully convicted of rape because of a false identification by the complaining witness and the witholding of exculpatory evidence by the prosecutor in his case.

The witnesses and the lawyers are lying.

This is where we come to the problem with this pithy sloganeering proffered by advocacy-types in general and feminists that fit really well on bumper stickers but make for bad praxis: In the criminal justice system, almost everyone is lying about something. Witnesses, lawyers, defendants, cops, jurors, and judges. Everybody is selling bullshit to everybody else. At the end of the game, the loser is the one stuck having to eat the biggest pile of bullshit. That’s usually the defendant.

Police in Ashland, Ore., started a program called You Have Options. Agencies that participate handle sexual-assault complaints in a radically different way. Victims can report a rape but request that the police not pursue criminal charges. The idea is to give more control to victims, who might otherwise be reluctant to involve themselves with law enforcement. The detective who founded the program believes it will help the police in the long term by increasing the number of people who come forward and allowing police to collect information that could be used in future investigations if a victim changes his or her mind.

Meanwhile, criminals are allowed to just keep walking the streets because the complaining witness, by some perverse nonlogic, is given more say-so in the process beyond the choice to testify or not.

Both programs are controversial. For instance, Stacy Galbraith, the detective in Colorado who arrested the serial rapist in Marie’s case, told us her starting point isn’t believing: “I think it’s listen to your victim. And then corroborate or refute based on how things go.”

This sounds suspiciously like actual police work. Are we so far gone as a society that skepticism and following the facts where they lead, even if it is to a dead end, is controversial?

You Have Options is an even tougher sell. Many police officers are instinctively resistant to the idea of not immediately investigating a rape. Their job, after all, is to catch bad guys, not let them get away.

It is clear that some law enforcement agencies have begun to experiment with ways to be more responsive to rape victims. It is equally clear that there are no simple solutions. The path forward will almost certainly be contentious. But if we are going to make it easier for victims to tell their stories to law enforcement, change is essential.

Here’s where I part ways with Armstrong and Williams (again). The purpose of law enforcement is to catch bad guys. The purpose of the criminal justice system is to protect defendants from the power of the state. The personal comfort of witnesses is not a goal nor should it be. Witnesses should be uncomfortable in testifying because of what is at stake: A person’s freedom or life. The process of depriving a defendant of their freedom should never be comfortable or easy, no matter how deserving of destruction the defendant may be.

Source

Black Matriarch Burns Her Children’s Feet With Scalding Water

The Holly Hill Police Department reported responding to a possible child abuse complaint on April 10th, 2017.

Police met with an investigator who told officers that she was notified of a child suffering from serious burns due to exposure to hot water. The 22-year-old mother of the child, Sheretta Marie Harris, called the police on April 8th. She told the operator that the child had been burned from hot bathtub water during a diaper change. The child was transported to the Halifax Medical Center before being transferred to the Arnold Palmer Hospital for treatment.

The Child Protection Team Case Coordinator spoke with the Holly Hill Police Department to show them photos of the burn. Several layers of skin had been burned off. The burns were also isolated to the child’s feet, as reported.

A few days later on April 13th, officers met with representatives from the the apartment complex that Sheretta lived in. They all knew of the incident after receiving several reports. They went on to show police the room where two hot water heaters were kept. Typically, hot water heaters are set to the lowest temperature for safety reasons. However, after the incident was reported, the temperature was found turned up on the hot water heater. No one has access to these settings besides the maintenance manager and management staff. It is unknown who adjusted these settings, but the maintenance manager believes someone forced open the door and turned up the temperature.

On April 24th, Holly Hill Police Department officers met with Sheretta Harris, She retold her story, still saying that the hot water had burned her child’s feet while trying to clean up the dirty diaper mess.

Finally, on May 8th, it is reported that an officer spoke with an ex-roommate of Sheretta. He claims that he was personally told by Sheretta Harris that she intentionally put the child’s feet in scalding water because she was mad. He went on to tell the officer that Sheretta had intentionally broke her child’s arm a year ago but claimed it was from a stroller accident. He says that Sheretta becomes very violent when angry.

Two days later, the University of Florida Child Protection Team Preliminary Medical and Risk Assessment Report showed that the burns were done intentionally.

Sherretta Harris is being charged with Aggravated Child Abuse.

Question: If we can allegedly have “Post Traumatic Slave Syndrome” because of wrongs done to ancestors long dead, why can’t we have “Post Traumatic Black Single Mother Syndrome” because the woman who raised us did so by terrorizing and physically abusing us? (kind of like Massa used to!)

Source

Archived Source

Black Matriarch Murders Both of Her Children

A Dayton mom who reportedly shot two of her children is being held on $1 million bond.

Claudena Helton appeared in court for the first time since the May 18th shooting. Police say Helton told them she fatally shot them to save them from the “evils of the world”.

Her 8-year-old daughter Khmorra and 6-year-old son Kaiden died from their wounds Sunday.

In an affidavit, police say Helton made the admission during an interview with officers. Police also interviewed Helton’s other daughter, who told them her mom had shot her brother and sister and that she’d asked her to help carry them out of the house.

Municipal Court Judge Christopher Roberts set bond Monday at $1 million for Helton and scheduled a preliminary hearing for May 30. A public defender entered not-guilty pleas for Helton to charges of attempted murder and felonious assault.

The charges likely will be revised later because of the children’s deaths after her arrest.

Family members said Claudena Helton appeared to have mental issues stemming from an incident where her son reported being assaulted at school at the Boonshoft museum in 2015. A spokesperson for Montgomery County job and family services said Childrens Services had an open case and were working with Helton at the time of the shooting.

Source

Archived Source

A Reply to “Breaking the Siege”

The Daily Californian opened its editorial page to the black-masked revolutionary cosplayers of Antifa to “set the record straight” on why they have a love affair with the idea of tormenting and killing their class enemies.

We would like to preface this statement by saying we do not represent every group involved in anti-fascist demonstrations here in Berkeley, or in the Bay Area. While many of our comrades may share our beliefs and opinions, we are not a unified group and we do not intend to speak for anyone but ourselves.

With that out of the way: Hello, UC Berkeley! We are those anti-fascists you’ve heard so much about recently. Let us introduce ourselves. Some of us are your fellow UC Berkeley students, while others are Berkeley City College students, UC Berkeley alumni or members of the Berkeley community.

Hello, Commies of Berkeley!

For security reasons, we don’t usually talk to the press. But the media coverage of our actions against the current wave of far-right mobilization in Berkeley has inspired us to express to the public why it is that we do what we do.

You may have never heard of Antifa until we marched onto Sproul Plaza on the night of Feb. 1. Our struggle is global and ongoing, with a history that stretches as far back as there have been fascists to resist.

Unfortunately, I had heard of you, but you were thankfully a largely European phenomenon, a pack of Communism-fetishists convinced that everyone not enthusiastically in your camp is a “fascist” in need of a good “bashing.”

The current visibility of militant anti-fascism is due to the Trump-era resurgence of open, violent white nationalism. They’re more than just 4chan trolls spouting racist rhetoric online. Last June, when the Traditionalist Workers Party and the Golden State Skinheads attempted to rally in Sacramento, they stabbed nine people in the ensuing confrontation with Antifa. Identity Evropa leader Nathan Damigo sucker-punched a woman on camera at the rally April 15.

According to the police, Antifas got stabbed after they initiated violence against the Traditionalist Workers Party, throwing water bottles at them and beating them with sticks. Imagine that: People, fascist, people accused of fascism, non-fascists, etc. don’t like being assaulted and will defend themselves from armed attackers with whatever they can lay their hands to, including knives.

Nathan Damigo punched Moldylocks aka AFTER she threatened to claim “100 Nazi scalps” (I’m no expert, but I’m certain that scalping people is a violent and criminal act) and AFTER she threw glass wine bottles at Trump supporters and threatened to strike him with one.

Never trust a Communist to tell the truth; always trust a Communist to misrepresent the truth.

Our opponents push the misconception that, by militantly confronting them, we are stifling their free speech. We may be a bunch of leftists and anarchists, but we’ve still read the Constitution.

Read it and probably understood none of it.

The First Amendment protects you from government censorship. It does not allow you to impose on the 14th Amendment rights of others, prevent other people from using their freedoms of speech and assembly to hold you accountable for the things you say, or guarantee you a right to a paid speaking gig on a college campus.

There is no interpretation of “Freedom of speech” or “freedom of assembly” include assaulting people with sticks, bottles, bike locks, and bear mace.

And who precisely the fuck are you Middle-Class revolutionaries that anyone must “account” themselves to you?

Ultimately, the bloc’s actions against Milo Yiannopoulos were not in response to the things he says, but the things he does. Yiannopoulos has a history of targeted harassment of transgender, Muslim and undocumented students at his campus speeches. On the night of Feb. 1, he planned to use his platform to teach the crowd how to report undocumented students to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. It was also rumored he planned to out undocumented students.

Notice the Doublethink in this paragraph: They opposed what Milo Yiannopoulos does, not what he said, but the only thing he did was speak.

It could be argued that Milo planned to hold illegal immigrant students “accountable” to American law.

This is not protected speech. You can’t yell “fire” in a crowded theater and you can’t out undocumented students on a sanctuary campus.

Hate to burst your Antifa bubble, but this analogy was stupid when Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. wrote it in 1919, and it is just as stupid nearly 100 years later when excreted from the pen of a black-clad pansy uses it out of context.

First, the quote itself in full:

“The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre AND causing a panic.”

Falsehood + Speech + Panic/Danger.

But the case itself (Schenk v. U.S., now thankfully overturned) had nothing to do with fires or panics; it was about a Socialist who distributed flyers (IN YIDDISH) encouraging men not to enlist in World War I.

But censors and moral busybodies for a century have been stroking themselves silly to that ill-thought bit of dictum.

Despite all of this, the UC Berkeley administration chose to put their students in danger. We decided this was unacceptable. You may disagree with our actions, but if it protected even one student from being targeted, then we are not ashamed.

This is the Communist/Antifa mentality in a nutshell: We don’t care if you disagree; we are not amenable to discourse on the legality, rationality, or utility of our actions; we are morally pure, therefore whatever we do is beyond reproach.

In dealing with Antifa, America is not dealing with a political movement, it is dealing with a cult.

Bay Area Antifa did not have any militant action planned for Ann Coulter’s event. While her views are disgusting and deserve to be protested, nobody wants to get attacked with a nightstick or go to jail over Ann Coulter. If any action had been taken, it would have been because of the extremists in attendance and looking for a fight at her speech.

Nobody wants to get beaten with a stick, hit with a glass bottle, sprayed with bear mace, or hit with a bike lock over Communism, yet here we are, all because Communists are self-righteous twats who imagine they have a right to assault people for disagreeing with them.

But these speakers know now to expect resistance. We didn’t have to shut Coulter down — she canceled once her financial backers and the administration recognized that her presence was unsafe and unprofitable.

Amazing how Communists have the marked inability to call anything by its proper name. They have half a dozen euphemisms for “violence” (direct action, resistance, militancy, protest, accountable) but the threat is always present and understood with them. Communists threaten the safety of speakers and people who want to hear the speaker and then call the person they oppose the problem.

Or, as a wife-beater would put it: If you would just behave, I wouldn’t have to beat you. Yes, Communists are the social equivalent of a domestic abuser.

You may have wondered where the masses of people in masks were April 27. We shut them down March 4 and April 15 because they wanted to prove they could rally in Berkeley. On April 27, they came from far and wide to fight Antifa. Instead of giving them what they wanted, we let them stand around in the park in their Spartan helmets, pretending to enjoy their open mic and getting sunburned.

Our ideology is not tethered to masculinity and strength — we don’t ever have to fight on their terms. We are also aware (because again, we live here) that on a Thursday afternoon, high schoolers and middle schoolers were in class in the area where the fascists wanted to hold their street fight.

Another Commie offering alternative history and flushing inconvenient facts down the memory hole.

The good Communists of r/Anarchism are at least honest enough to admit that they got BTFO on April 15th.

As for the 27th, and this is merely speculation, after the shellacking Antifa et al. took on the 15th, the Black Bloc decided not to combat Trump supporters for control of the streets again, at least not until they have a strategic or numerical advantage.

You’re probably sick of feeling like Berkeley is a warzone. We are, too. We’re tired of seeing Identity Evropa propaganda on campus and up and down the streets we grew up on. We’re tired of hearing about kids at Albany High using Nazi salutes in the hallways.

And we’re tired of fighting a second front against public apathy and misinformation.

As the great Ludacris once rhymed:

“If you tired, be quiet and go to sleep, ho.”

Your fatigue and low energy is not an argument in support of your position.

We are anti-fascists. We are not paramilitary, outside agitators, or punks looking for a fight. We are members of this community who are invested in its safety.

We understand that not everyone can join us in this fight. All we ask is that you understand why we take to the streets.

At least the writer got one thing right: Antifa isn’t looking for fights; they are looking for lynchings. They are looking to isolate and overwhelm their enemies with surprise, anonymity, and superior numbers. Stripped of their advantages, they slink away and write letters to Dailycal pleading that they are “the good guys” and begging people not infected with this social/political cancer called Communism to rally behind them.

Fortunately, people are paying attention Antifa’s actions and not their crocodile tears and realize that these people are engaging in violence for the sake of violence and that their definition of “Fascist” means “anyone who does not swear allegiance to Antifa.”

Source

Archived Source