Black Matriarch Committed for Attempted Murder of Her Son; Released From The Funny Farm; Kills Her Granddaughter

Wig:

 

No Wig:

colton-grandmother

A California woman arrested Tuesday in the stabbing death of her 18-month-old granddaughter had a lengthy history of mental illness and became distraught late last year when she was separated from her young, special needs son, her relatives said.

But why? Who would be so heartless as to separate a loving mother from her “special needs son”?

Nicole Darrington-Clark, 43, was arrested a day after authorities said she stabbed her daughter and two young granddaughters at their home, killing one of them, then fleeing the grisly scene.

Oh, because she’s stabby. Black matriarchs don’t have to be mentally ill to be stabby. They do that when they are allegedly sane.

She was found in nearby San Bernardino and is being held on $1 million bail, police said.

Darrington-Clark has a history of mental health issues and was found not guilty by reason of insanity in the 2005 attempted murder of her own children and sent to a state psychiatric hospital.

Hey, you what would be best for society? Letting the crazy woman who tried to murder multiple people loose on society again.

California Uber Alles.

Her sister, LaShunda Clark, and father, Samuel Clark, said they were concerned about her well-being since her release but said she had seemed to improve before becoming distraught late last year when she was separated from her special needs son, who is now 5.

Since then, she had returned to live with her husband and son in Riverside County and had gone to visit her now-grown daughter and granddaughters Monday in Colton, her sister said, adding she did not know what triggered the attack.

Pause.

This woman is 43, was NGRI’d to the funny farm in 2005 for ATTEMPTED MURDERS, but somehow, somebody found it in them to fuck and impregnate a crazy, 37-year-old woman and pop out a slow kid?

Black men, DO BETTER. Fucking crazy bitches is a bad look all around.

“None of us has slept in the last two days. It has been terrible for our family,” LaShunda Clark said. “It was never anything about her trying to hurt us. I just don’t understand. We don’t know. We’re just asking God to just keep her safe.”

The San Bernardino County coroner’s division identified the girl killed as 18-month old Damani Trouter. The two wounded victims are hospitalized in stable condition.

Investigators do not know the motive for the attack, police Cpl. Ray Mendez said Monday. Police did not return calls seeking additional information.

Social services officials declined to comment in Riverside County, where LaShunda Clark said her sister had recently returned to live with her husband and young son.

I repeat, fucking crazy, stabby bitches is a bad look. Marrying crazy, stabby bitches is a bad look.

It wasn’t immediately clear when or why Darrington-Clark was released from the hospital.

In the earlier case, she pleaded guilty to stabbing her 14-year-old son and throwing her 10-year-old daughter out of a moving minivan in 2005. But a judge found Darrington-Clark not guilty by reason of insanity and sent her to a psychiatric hospital.

Crazy, stabby bitch has AT LEAST three kids and tried to kill two of them.

I repeat, fucking crazy, stabby bitches is a bad look.

Attorney Robert Sheahen, who represented her at that time, said she was diagnosed with schizophrenia and that Los Angeles County prosecutors had agreed with the judge’s decision.

“This is one of the greatest sadnesses I’ve ever encountered in my 40-year career,” he said Tuesday.

After certain point, this ceases to be sad and descends to the farcical. The Black Matriarch can do her level best to try and murder people and the government says “well, you didn’t successfully kill anybody this time, so, we’ll let you go if you promise to be good.”

A spokesman at the California Department of State Hospitals said officials can’t comment on individual cases.

At the apartment complex in Colton, about 60 miles (97 kilometers) east of Los Angeles, neighbor Tim Hill told the Press-Enterprise newspaper the wounded woman ran into his apartment Monday seeking help after the attack.

He said he ran upstairs to her apartment and saw the stabbed child and found her sister in the closet, shaking. Police decided they couldn’t wait for paramedics and took the girl to the hospital, Hill said.

Another neighbor, Patty Williams, told the newspaper that the wounded woman had been “stabbed everywhere.”

“I’m sad,” Williams said. “I feel like my soul left my body because this is disgusting.”

Patty, I’m not sad. The reason I’m not sad is because this stuff is predictable. There is a lot of untreated mental illness among Black people in America and it usually doesn’t get treated until someone commits some heinous crime.

Some people are leery of psychotherapy and I’m one of them. The Soviet Union amply demonstrated that psychiatry/psychology are potent weapons in the hands of tyrants. But some people really do need to be drugged out of their chemical imbalances or talked out whatever defects in their personality are leading them towards a cliff.

But, nobody is actually going to give a shit because when black people kill other black people, that’s just the Welfare-Penal State working the way it’s supposed to.

Source

Archived Source

A Reply to “Breaking the Siege”

The Daily Californian opened its editorial page to the black-masked revolutionary cosplayers of Antifa to “set the record straight” on why they have a love affair with the idea of tormenting and killing their class enemies.

We would like to preface this statement by saying we do not represent every group involved in anti-fascist demonstrations here in Berkeley, or in the Bay Area. While many of our comrades may share our beliefs and opinions, we are not a unified group and we do not intend to speak for anyone but ourselves.

With that out of the way: Hello, UC Berkeley! We are those anti-fascists you’ve heard so much about recently. Let us introduce ourselves. Some of us are your fellow UC Berkeley students, while others are Berkeley City College students, UC Berkeley alumni or members of the Berkeley community.

Hello, Commies of Berkeley!

For security reasons, we don’t usually talk to the press. But the media coverage of our actions against the current wave of far-right mobilization in Berkeley has inspired us to express to the public why it is that we do what we do.

You may have never heard of Antifa until we marched onto Sproul Plaza on the night of Feb. 1. Our struggle is global and ongoing, with a history that stretches as far back as there have been fascists to resist.

Unfortunately, I had heard of you, but you were thankfully a largely European phenomenon, a pack of Communism-fetishists convinced that everyone not enthusiastically in your camp is a “fascist” in need of a good “bashing.”

The current visibility of militant anti-fascism is due to the Trump-era resurgence of open, violent white nationalism. They’re more than just 4chan trolls spouting racist rhetoric online. Last June, when the Traditionalist Workers Party and the Golden State Skinheads attempted to rally in Sacramento, they stabbed nine people in the ensuing confrontation with Antifa. Identity Evropa leader Nathan Damigo sucker-punched a woman on camera at the rally April 15.

According to the police, Antifas got stabbed after they initiated violence against the Traditionalist Workers Party, throwing water bottles at them and beating them with sticks. Imagine that: People, fascist, people accused of fascism, non-fascists, etc. don’t like being assaulted and will defend themselves from armed attackers with whatever they can lay their hands to, including knives.

Nathan Damigo punched Moldylocks aka AFTER she threatened to claim “100 Nazi scalps” (I’m no expert, but I’m certain that scalping people is a violent and criminal act) and AFTER she threw glass wine bottles at Trump supporters and threatened to strike him with one.

Never trust a Communist to tell the truth; always trust a Communist to misrepresent the truth.

Our opponents push the misconception that, by militantly confronting them, we are stifling their free speech. We may be a bunch of leftists and anarchists, but we’ve still read the Constitution.

Read it and probably understood none of it.

The First Amendment protects you from government censorship. It does not allow you to impose on the 14th Amendment rights of others, prevent other people from using their freedoms of speech and assembly to hold you accountable for the things you say, or guarantee you a right to a paid speaking gig on a college campus.

There is no interpretation of “Freedom of speech” or “freedom of assembly” include assaulting people with sticks, bottles, bike locks, and bear mace.

And who precisely the fuck are you Middle-Class revolutionaries that anyone must “account” themselves to you?

Ultimately, the bloc’s actions against Milo Yiannopoulos were not in response to the things he says, but the things he does. Yiannopoulos has a history of targeted harassment of transgender, Muslim and undocumented students at his campus speeches. On the night of Feb. 1, he planned to use his platform to teach the crowd how to report undocumented students to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. It was also rumored he planned to out undocumented students.

Notice the Doublethink in this paragraph: They opposed what Milo Yiannopoulos does, not what he said, but the only thing he did was speak.

It could be argued that Milo planned to hold illegal immigrant students “accountable” to American law.

This is not protected speech. You can’t yell “fire” in a crowded theater and you can’t out undocumented students on a sanctuary campus.

Hate to burst your Antifa bubble, but this analogy was stupid when Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. wrote it in 1919, and it is just as stupid nearly 100 years later when excreted from the pen of a black-clad pansy uses it out of context.

First, the quote itself in full:

“The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre AND causing a panic.”

Falsehood + Speech + Panic/Danger.

But the case itself (Schenk v. U.S., now thankfully overturned) had nothing to do with fires or panics; it was about a Socialist who distributed flyers (IN YIDDISH) encouraging men not to enlist in World War I.

But censors and moral busybodies for a century have been stroking themselves silly to that ill-thought bit of dictum.

Despite all of this, the UC Berkeley administration chose to put their students in danger. We decided this was unacceptable. You may disagree with our actions, but if it protected even one student from being targeted, then we are not ashamed.

This is the Communist/Antifa mentality in a nutshell: We don’t care if you disagree; we are not amenable to discourse on the legality, rationality, or utility of our actions; we are morally pure, therefore whatever we do is beyond reproach.

In dealing with Antifa, America is not dealing with a political movement, it is dealing with a cult.

Bay Area Antifa did not have any militant action planned for Ann Coulter’s event. While her views are disgusting and deserve to be protested, nobody wants to get attacked with a nightstick or go to jail over Ann Coulter. If any action had been taken, it would have been because of the extremists in attendance and looking for a fight at her speech.

Nobody wants to get beaten with a stick, hit with a glass bottle, sprayed with bear mace, or hit with a bike lock over Communism, yet here we are, all because Communists are self-righteous twats who imagine they have a right to assault people for disagreeing with them.

But these speakers know now to expect resistance. We didn’t have to shut Coulter down — she canceled once her financial backers and the administration recognized that her presence was unsafe and unprofitable.

Amazing how Communists have the marked inability to call anything by its proper name. They have half a dozen euphemisms for “violence” (direct action, resistance, militancy, protest, accountable) but the threat is always present and understood with them. Communists threaten the safety of speakers and people who want to hear the speaker and then call the person they oppose the problem.

Or, as a wife-beater would put it: If you would just behave, I wouldn’t have to beat you. Yes, Communists are the social equivalent of a domestic abuser.

You may have wondered where the masses of people in masks were April 27. We shut them down March 4 and April 15 because they wanted to prove they could rally in Berkeley. On April 27, they came from far and wide to fight Antifa. Instead of giving them what they wanted, we let them stand around in the park in their Spartan helmets, pretending to enjoy their open mic and getting sunburned.

Our ideology is not tethered to masculinity and strength — we don’t ever have to fight on their terms. We are also aware (because again, we live here) that on a Thursday afternoon, high schoolers and middle schoolers were in class in the area where the fascists wanted to hold their street fight.

Another Commie offering alternative history and flushing inconvenient facts down the memory hole.

The good Communists of r/Anarchism are at least honest enough to admit that they got BTFO on April 15th.

As for the 27th, and this is merely speculation, after the shellacking Antifa et al. took on the 15th, the Black Bloc decided not to combat Trump supporters for control of the streets again, at least not until they have a strategic or numerical advantage.

You’re probably sick of feeling like Berkeley is a warzone. We are, too. We’re tired of seeing Identity Evropa propaganda on campus and up and down the streets we grew up on. We’re tired of hearing about kids at Albany High using Nazi salutes in the hallways.

And we’re tired of fighting a second front against public apathy and misinformation.

As the great Ludacris once rhymed:

“If you tired, be quiet and go to sleep, ho.”

Your fatigue and low energy is not an argument in support of your position.

We are anti-fascists. We are not paramilitary, outside agitators, or punks looking for a fight. We are members of this community who are invested in its safety.

We understand that not everyone can join us in this fight. All we ask is that you understand why we take to the streets.

At least the writer got one thing right: Antifa isn’t looking for fights; they are looking for lynchings. They are looking to isolate and overwhelm their enemies with surprise, anonymity, and superior numbers. Stripped of their advantages, they slink away and write letters to Dailycal pleading that they are “the good guys” and begging people not infected with this social/political cancer called Communism to rally behind them.

Fortunately, people are paying attention Antifa’s actions and not their crocodile tears and realize that these people are engaging in violence for the sake of violence and that their definition of “Fascist” means “anyone who does not swear allegiance to Antifa.”

Source

Archived Source

Anti-Trump “Peace and Love” Riots: The Tribalism of the American Progressive

I have not seen this many Democrats throw this much of a hissy fit about a Republican president since 1860 when Abraham Lincoln became President-Elect.

…he(Lincoln) showed me his recent contributions by mail of the [Southern] chivalry; there were editorials, in pompous language, referring to him as the Illinois ape, a baboon, a satyr, a negro, a mulatto, a buffoon, a monster, an abortion, an idiot, etc. There were threats of hanging him, burning him, decapitating him, flogging him, etc. The most foul, disgusting and obscene language was used in the press which were the organs of the Southern elite par excellence, of the nation, as they thought. Nor had the limner’s art been neglected: in addition to several rude sketches of assassination, by various modes, a copy of Harper’s Weekly was among the collection, with a full length portrait of the President-elect; but some cheerful pro-slavery wage had added a gallows, a noose and a black cap.

-Henry Clay Whitney, 1860

Am I suggesting that the idiot children of the middle class, the effete Social Justice thumbsuckers who couldn’t bust a grape in a fruit fight will attempt secession? Not at all.

Downtown L.A. Anti-Trump Protests Lead to More Than 200 Arrests: LAPD

As a third night of protests over Donald Trump’s election swept through major cities, more that 200 people were arrested in the downtown Los Angeles area, police said Friday.

The Los Angeles Police Department made 185 arrests, and the California Highway Patrol made 30 arrests, an LAPD spokesperson said.

One officer was in stable condition Friday after being assaulted by someone who was trying to tag LAPD headquarters with graffiti. The individual involved was also hospitalized.

Most of the protesters appeared to be young — under 30. One young man told KTLA that there was a feeling of “love” and unity among Trump’s critics.

“When you’re in that crowd … you know everyone’s not just saying ‘F Donald Trump’ just to say it,” protester Arnold Jimenes told KTLA. “Everyone feels that this man should not be representing our country.”

Nothing says “love” and “unity” like coming together for just two minutes every day to hate Emmanuel Goldstein…I mean Donald Trump and reaffirm our love and unity for Big Brother.

Let’s look at a little more “love” that Hillary backers have in their hearts.

BROOKLYN SINGER CHARGED WITH ASSAULT DURING ANTI-TRUMP PROTESTS IN MANHATTAN

http://abc7ny.com/video/embed/?pid=1602436

The lead singer of the Harlem Gospel Choir is under arrest, accused of assaulting a Trump supporter during an anti-Trump demonstration in Manhattan Thursday night.

Shacara McLaurin, 23, of Brooklyn was arrested a short time after performing at the Plaza Hotel.

Her family says she and a friend walked past the protest in front of Trump Tower, when a Trump supporter assumed they were protesters and followed them, calling them the N word.

The 74-year-old Trump supporter suffered a cut on his head. Mclaurin is expected to be arraigned Friday afternoon.

The arrest came as a large group of demonstrators once again gathered outside Trump Tower on Fifth Avenue Thursday night.

McLaughlin was charged with felony assault. She is believed to be a Clinton supporter.

“This was a dispute over the Clinton Trump campaign,” police said.

He choked me! And threw me out! And called me a n*gger!

Oh, wait, this isn’t Azaelia Banks.

Black females love them some Jesus. They love Jesus so much that they’ll get done singing hymns and praise songs, then go fight in the streets because somebody said something they don’t like. Read Matthew 10:14; If anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, leave that home or town and shake the dust off your feet.

They love singing and dancing for Jesus, but they don’t like doing what Jesus told them.

Moving on to Democratic People’s Republic of Portlandia.

Another night of nationwide protests against Donald Trump’s election came to a head in Portland, where thousands marched and some smashed store windows, lit firecrackers and sparked a dumpster blaze.

Some 4,000 protesters surged into the downtown area late Thursday night with chants like “we reject the president-elect!”

Yes, these are the people who should have the policymaking power in America; the ones who destroy property and start riots when they don’t get their way. These are the “love” and “unity” people. They’re against haters like Donald Trump. And business owners. And dumpsters.

Head on down the Left Coast to Oakland.

Crews were mopping up Oakland’s downtown and parts of Uptown on Friday morning, following a third night of protests opposing the election of Donald Trump that included at least 11 arrests.

Although smaller and less chaotic than Wednesday’s protest, Thursday’s march was marked by dumpster fires and broken windows in at least two downtown businesses.

The 11 arrests, plus another seven citations issued were for a variety of suspected crimes, including assault on officers, vandalism, failure to disperse and public intoxication.

One of the people arrested had a cache of Molotov cocktails, Officer Johnna Watson said early Friday.

“HURR HURR! Uneducated Trump voters!”

Do you know what the non-college educated Trump voters didn’t haven’t been doing for the last three days? Clogging up the streets, destroying property and trying to burn shit down.

Let’s hop across the flyover states (because who cares what these unwashed, landlocked non-degreed peasants think, am I right?) to Richmond, VA.

http://up.anv.bz/latest/anvload.html?key=eyJtIjoiTElOIiwidiI6IjExNTE1MzQiLCJwbHVnaW5zIjp7ImRmcCI6eyJjbGllbnRTaWRlIjp7ImFkVGFnVXJsIjoiaHR0cDovL3B1YmFkcy5nLmRvdWJsZWNsaWNrLm5ldC9nYW1wYWQvYWRzP3N6PTF4MTAwMCZpdT0vNTY3OC9tZy5XUklDL25ld3MvbG9jYWwtbmV3cy9yaWNobW9uZC9yaWNobW9uZC1lbGVjdGlvbi1wcm90ZXN0ZXItZGlzYXBwb2ludGVkLXNheXMtaS10aGluay13ZS1yZXByZXNlbnRlZC1vdXItY2l0eS12ZXJ5LXdlbGwvZGV0YWlsJmNpdV9zenM9MzAweDI1MCZnZGZwX3JlcT0xJmVudj12cCZvdXRwdXQ9eG1sX3Zhc3QyJmFkX3J1bGU9MSJ9fSwiYW5hbHl0aWNzIjp7InBkYiI6IjQ3NDYzMzk5Iiwic2VydmVyVVJMIjoiaHR0cDovL2FuYWx5dGljcy12Mi5hbnZhdG8uY29tL1ZpZGVvQW5hbHl0aWNzL3NyYy92aWRlb19sb2cucGhwIn0sIm9tbml0dXJlIjp7InByb2ZpbGUiOiJsaW4iLCJhY2NvdW50IjoibGludHZ3cmljLGRwc2dsb2JhbCIsInRyYWNraW5nU2VydmVyIjoibGludHYuMTIyLjJvNy5uZXQiLCJwYXJlbnRQYWdlVVJMIjoiaHR0cDovL3dyaWMuY29tLzIwMTYvMTEvMTAvcmljaG1vbmQtZWxlY3Rpb24tcHJvdGVzdGVyLWRpc2FwcG9pbnRlZC1zYXlzLWktdGhpbmstd2UtcmVwcmVzZW50ZWQtb3VyLWNpdHktdmVyeS13ZWxsLyIsInBJbnN0YW5jZSI6InAwIiwicGxheWVyTmFtZSI6IkFudmF0b1VuaXZlcnNhbFBsYXllciJ9LCJyZWFsVGltZUFuYWx5dGljcyI6dHJ1ZX0sImFudmFjayI6ImFudmF0b19tY3BfbGluX3dlYl9wcm9kXzRjMzZmYmZkNGQ4ZDhlY2FlNjQ4ODY1NmUyMWFjNmQxYWM5NzI3NDkiLCJodG1sNSI6dHJ1ZX0=

As roughly 150 anti-Trump protesters took to the streets of Richmond Wednesday night, the state Republican headquarters and several monuments were vandalized, including the Jeff Davis Memorial, which was spray-painted with the phrase “your vote was a hate crime.”

Virginia State Police arrested 10 people and Richmond Police arrested two more. All were charged with unlawful assembly. Of the 12 arrested, 10 were VCU students.

“We represented ourselves very well…except for the vandalism and property destruction.”

But the most disturbing incident is the “your vote was a hate crime” graffiti, because it reflects the tribal mentality of the anti-Trump brigade.

They cluck their tongues at anything they think is “right-wing violence” but when they run about smashing property, committing assaults, and disturbing public order, it’s okay, because they’re the ones doing it, and they have really, really, REALLY important reasons for doing it. These are the same types who clutch their pearls at that famous Nixon interview in which he stated that (in the context of national security):“Well, when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal.””

Yesterday, I posted about how the mainstream media in America is dying due to self-inflicted gunshot wounds to its own head. The American progressives are suffering from a similar ailment; The election on Tuesday demonstrated that the American public does not believe that Democrats in particular and the American Left in general argues any position in good faith, and the reality is that they don’t because they are incapable of doing so. They are incapable of doing so because they have abandoned the tools of reason and logic and grammar, and taken up sophistry and demagoguery. They refused to argue politics and simply proclaimed, loudly and often, that anyone who opposed them was guilty of moral turpitude (You’re a racist/sexist/homophobe/Islamophobe/Immigrantophobe/Transphobe/Tax-phobe/War-phobe/Insert your ad hominem of choice here) and to be disregarded.

And finally, after 50 years of this (its always gone on, but it didn’t become the Democrats primary weapon of choice until the 1964 Presidential election between Barry Goldwater and Lyndon Johnson), the American public is immune to this simplistic name-calling and shaming. Now, when people are called (Insert your ad hominem of choice) they don’t bat an eyelash at it, because they know if the speaker is a Democrat, or some Democrat operative, they are likely full of shit and just trying to circumvent an argument without having to engage it.

Democrats. Anti-Trump protesters. This is the political landscape you have cultivated. This is the level to which you have dragged down political discourse in America. This is the fruit of identity politics and political tribalism. This is the bed which you have made. Now lie quietly in it.

New Jersey Man Falsely Accused of Rape Discusses Road to Exoneration and Underclass of the Convicted

Exonerations of wrongfully convicted people have become so routine in recent years that their stories are almost commonplace. We think we know the narrative: A defendant languishes in prison for a crime he did not commit; through tenacious legal work — or the magic of DNA tests — he is freed.

Then there are stories like Dion Harrell’s, which show that the suffering attached to unjust verdicts can linger even after the innocent are sprung from their prison cells.

In September 1988, Mr. Harrell was arrested in the rape of a 17-year-old girl as she was walking home from her job at a McDonald’s in Long Branch, N.J. A neighborhood guy who often played basketball with local police detectives, Mr. Harrell lived across the street from the fast-food restaurant. When he was arrested, the victim immediately identified him as her assailant.

“The cops were like, ‘Why’d you do it?’” Mr. Harrell said. “I was like, ‘Do what?’ They said, ‘Why’d you rape her?’ I just broke down crying. I still cry — it hurts.”

BELIEVE HER.

Mr. Harrell was found guilty in 1992, and from 1993 to 1997, he was imprisoned at the Mid-State Correctional Facility at the Fort Dix Army base. When he was released, he was required under Megan’s Law to be added to the state’s sex-offender registry. The law, which was named for Megan Kanka, a 7-year-old girl who was raped and murdered near Trenton in 1994, precluded him from living near children. Though he wanted at first to move in with his sister, his sister had two sons, both of whom were minors at the time. So state agencies helped him find a hotel room, he said, where he lived for nearly a year.

Meanwhile, his name and image were spread across the internet — not only on the state’s website, but also on private pages that alert residents to sex offenders living in their area. He said he was spotted in — and hounded out of — bars. Friends, and friends of friends, posted insults on his Facebook page. Landlords did not want him in their buildings. Employers refused to hire him.

Yes, the American penal system really does work. Honestly. Look at this successful story of the care and effort the state of New Jersey expended to not only release, but reintegrate Mr. Harrell back into society.

I’ll give you a minute to get the laughter out of your system.

While still in prison, Mr. Harrell had written to the Innocence Project asking for help in getting a DNA test that he hoped would clear his name. “The reason I am writing your office,” his original letter read, “is because I am innocent of the crime.” He added that he “cannot begin to explain” the psychological trauma he had endured.

At that point, however, the organization already had thousands of defendants on its waiting list. It was also difficult, Ms. Potkin said, to correspond with Mr. Harrell because of his transient living situation.

Eventually, in 2014, she took the case. She faced an immediate hurdle: Under New Jersey law at the time, only defendants still in prison were entitled to a DNA test. (The law has since been amended.)

But Ms. Potkin persuaded the Monmouth County prosecutor’s office to grant Mr. Harrell an exception. Last month, the test conducted on semen came back in his favor; and on July 22, Christopher J. Gramiccioni, the prosecutor, announced that he would move to have Mr. Harrell’s conviction thrown out, which would trigger the removal of his name from the sex-offender list.

Justice delayed is better than no justice at all, I suppose.

It is hard to know precisely how many cases like Mr. Harrell’s exist across the country. But one man who experienced a similar ordeal is Eddie Lowery, a former Army specialist, who in 1982 was wrongfully convicted of raping a 63-year-old woman as she lay sleeping in her home in Ogden, Kan. Mr. Lowery, who is now 57 and lives in California, served 10 years in prison. When he got out and had to register as a sex offender, he was so afraid of being recognized that he hid his house’s address plate behind a flower pot.

First the sex offender registry and all of the consequences it entails. Now we have the terror watchlists in all of its due process-violating glory.

What comes tomorrow, I wonder?

Archived Source

Hoes Gon Be Hoes: Featuring the Huffington Post

I’ve reached a resolution: I’m going to stop naming the authors of the garbage that the Huffingpaint Post publishes as commentary. At this point, they are as interchangeable as factory-issued tires.

Another female has “bravely” decided to have a “conversation” (in woman-speak, conversation means you sit there silently while she whines and wags her finger at you) on this “taboo” topic (that at least five other females have probably blogged/tweeted/tumblr’d about in the last hour)…sexual assault.

It was only last month that the world learnt of a convicted rapist from Stanford University.

His name was Brock Turner.

Pause. Turner was convicted of sexual assault, not rape. They are two distinct offenses with separate elements. I know feminists love saying “rape.” For some reason, that word “rape” tickles their funny places to say it (rape). But “rape” isn’t like “fuck.” “Rape” is a legal term of art and has a specific meaning. “Fuck” is more like rhetorical seasoning, like pepper; you add just the right amount to add spice to your verbal dishes.

People in the States were already familiar with the case which had sparked outrage after the defendant was sentenced to a mere six months’ jail time, despite the fact 13 jurors unanimously found him guilty.

I don’t know how they do things in the godless, barbaric wilderness known as Australia, but in the U.S., our criminal jury trials consist of 12 petit jurors and 1 or more alternates, not 13 jurors. (See California Constitution, Article 1, Section 16, Paragraph 3.)

In criminal actions in which a felony is charged, the jury shall consist of 12 persons. In criminal actions in which a misdemeanor is charged, the jury shall consist of 12 persons or a lesser number agreed on by the parties in open court.

Also, to declare that the jury unanimously found him guilty is a tautology. For a person, in America, to be found guilty of a crime in a jury trial, then the jury had to be unanimous in its verdict.

But it wasn’t until Buzzfeed published the letter the victim had read to the judge and her convicted rapist after the light sentence was handed down, that the rest of the world would learn of this sexual assault narrative.

Rich man gets rich man’s justice. Stop the fucking presses.

The letter echoed the voices of millions of other victims and created a space for an important conversation.

Millions of other females are getting falling down drunk and finger-popped in the bushes? I feel like I’m missing out.

A conversation that addressed a scary and taboo subject. And one that we, the public, have become so skilled at ignoring.

Most significantly, the letter illustrated the total lack of recognition and empathy for the victim and the deep rooted problems that exist within the justice system in cases of rape and sexual assault.

A letter, a one-sided lecture from an accuser to a defendant is a “conversation” in the deluded minds of feminists. No exchange, just you sit there and take it.

Dr Marika Guggisberg from Curtin University’s Department of Health Promotion and Sexology teaches a lot about victim blaming and consent and explains the role alcohol plays in reports of sexual assault.

If you are drunk, you cannot give consent

“When a toxicology report reveals there was alcohol involved, immediately there is this assumption she has just drank too much and the responsibility is placed squarely on the woman to protect herself from sexual violation,” Guggisberg told The Huffington Post Australia.

“This perception is so ingrained in our society that even criminal justice officials seem to struggle at times not to engage in victim blaming,” Guggisberg said.

She says the attitude that females who are intoxicated place themselves at risk of being taken advantage of sexually, and that it’s their responsibility alone to keep safe, needs to change.

“Even if you engage in some form of sexual activity and then decide you don’t want to go further you can withdraw your consent without any feelings of guilt — that is your right.”

Let me go get my lemonade and a lap blanket before do this “back in my day” analogy:

When I was a young boy, we had girls in our class who were, to put it nicely, assholes. And being assholes, they liked to play asshole games. One of these games was a little rhyme/threat where they would link arms and walk around chanting “I am blind, I can’t see, if I knock you down, don’t blame it on me, KICK!” and walk around kicking people. Now, if you kicked them back, first, they’d try to kick your ass, because these were black females and black females are most dangerous in packs; but if they didn’t think they could get the better of you, they would run and tell. And the teacher (usually another female and more sympathetic to one of her own sex) would punish you because “you don’t hit girls” (despite the fact that the girls initiated the conflict and had no right to do so).

Where am I going with this analogy you might be wondering? Good. It’s about personal responsibility. You, as the holder and primary beneficiary of your own body, bear the primary responsibility for its care and well-being. If you engage in risky conduct, like running around and assaulting innocent bystanders, or getting drunk and lowering your cognitive abilities in the presence of strangers, then yes, you bear some responsibility when bad things happen to you.

This argument that other people bear any responsibility for the safety of any given female beyond civility is ridiculous.

And because people are stupid, let me go ahead and knock this on out: Nobody “deserves” to be “raped,” just like nobody deserves to be murdered, robbed, beaten, blackmailed, maimed, etc. We don’t live in a world of “deserve.” If we lived in the world of “deserve,” nobody would have their natural rights violated. We live in the world of causality, and in that world, bad choices get bad outcomes, even when those bad choices are made by somebody else.

Sexual assault prevention

Guggisberg spends a lot of time educating her students around three focal points that are paramount to rape prevention.

“The potential victim, but also the potential offender and the potential bystander — all of us play an important role in preventing sexual assault,” Guggisberg said.

In order for an assault to take place there are three things that need to happen.

“There needs to be a suitable target, there needs to be a willing offender and there needs to be the absence of a capable guardian,” Guggisberg said.

Guggisberg explains the importance of making sure you are not isolated.

“If there is a suitable target and a willing offender but there is also a capable guardian, then there is not going to be a sexual assault.”

“A capable guardian?” Are you putting me on? I’m not here to “guard” anyone. It’s no one’s duty to save you from your own drunken self. Hell, not even the police have a legal duty to save anyone. (see Warren v. District of Columbia).

But this is objectionable because it goes to the idea of male disposability, that a man is just supposed to be standing guard while a female drunkenly flits about doing whatever silly thing pops into her inebriated brain and the minute someone tries to take some pussy from her, the disposable male steps in and says:

YOU SHALL NOT PASS!

Meanwhile, you don’t know this guy from Adam. He might back off. Then again, he might really want some pussy and decide he’ll gladly crack your skull to get to it. Then, you have a fight on your hands. Then, it’s either you or him (because a female is not much use in a fight anyway, much less a drunk one). So either you beat him up, he beats you up, you kill him, or he kills you.

And what do you get for being a “capable guardian”? Is the drunk female going to reward you with some pussy for saving it from the evil Brock Turner-esque rapey male? A chaste peck on the cheek perhaps? A handshake? A pat on the head? Money? Rewards in the afterlife? The warm fuzzies from knowing that you have saved pussy that you aren’t getting?

False reporting

“False rape accusations have a globally low rate of less than 10 percent,” Guggisberg said.

“The concept of ‘false accusation’ of sexual assault is generally defined as making a report of sexual assault victimisation when no sexual assault was committed, meaning, the alleged perpetrator is falsely accused.”

In Australia, false accusations of sexual assault are extremely rare with an estimated prevalence rate of about 2 percent of sexual assault reports being classified as “false”.

Guggisberg explains that given that prevalence data are estimates, they are by nature unreliable.

“It is important to note that myths of false reporting affect credibility of victimised individuals and the investigators’ determination whether consent was given. This may contribute to an overestimation of false reporting,” Guggisberg said.

Okay, this is stupid, no matter how many times it gets repeated.

“Well, golly-gee, it’s only 2-8%/less than 10% of men!”

Ma’am, an injustice is an injustice and is objectionable, no matter if it happens to just one man or if it happens to one million men. To turn the massive, merciless power of the state against an innocent man, to deprive him of his life, his security, his wealth, his freedom, and his good name, flies in the face of the concepts of the rule of law and of human decency.

Would this female be so cavalier as to make the statement, “well, the state only executes the wrong person 10% of the time, therefore, stop talking about it”? I don’t think so, but when it comes to female vagina vs. male freedom, despite admitting that the injustice exists, she will accept the injustice and defend it.

False allegations are not a common event

Another area Guggisberg focuses on is the importance of being careful not to misinterpret acquittals.

“If a person is acquitted that does not necessarily mean he did not sexually assault the woman who claims to have been victimised. It often just means there is not enough evidence,” Guggisberg said.

“False allegations of sexual assault are very rare but there is the general misconception that it is a common event.”

“However, research consistently suggests that the absolute vast majority of individuals who make the claim of sexual victimisation have been sexually assaulted,” Guggisberg said.

“The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.”

The absence of evidence that I was raped doesn’t mean that I wasn’t really raped/abducted by UFOs/the lost heir of the Romanovs.

This is where the feminists’ willful ignorance of history shines through. The purpose of the criminal court system, and the rules put in place, are supposed to protect the defendant. Why? Because history demonstrates the alternatives to placing the burden of proof on the accuser and giving the defendant the presumption of innocence: Bills of attainder, torture, hearsay, spectral evidence, perjury for hire, secret trials, trials in absentia, show trials, and host of other injustices that end in the same place: the violation of rights and the destruction of the innocent.

This doesn’t trouble feminists because their purpose is not to do justice; it is to extract collective vengeance against the male sex for existing.

Archived Source

Teenager Makes False Rape Accusation At Woman’s Behest

A Dos Palos woman was arrested for allegedly forcing a teenager to report a rape that never happened, police said Monday.

An investigation into an allegation of rape began May 1, after a 13-year-old girl said she was assaulted by a man, police said in a news release.

Officers did not release the suspect’s name.

Police Chief Barry Mann told the Sun-Star that investigators hope to withhold the suspect’s name to protect the identity of the teenage girl.

Police said the man also was threatened at gunpoint after the 53-year-old woman told the girl’s family about the alleged rape. It was not immediately clear when the alleged threat occurred.

The witnesses gave conflicting stories and police searched cellphones and surveillance footage from a local convenience store after the initial report, police said.

Eventually the girl admitted that the accusation was false and said she was forced by the 53-year-old to make the claim, authorities said. The girl was turned over to Child Protective Services, police said.

The woman, who was described as the guardian of the girl, was arrested on suspicion of providing false information, and suspicion of directing the 13-year-old during the false reporting, police said. It’s unclear how the two are related.

The woman also was arrested on conspiracy charges related to an assault with a deadly weapon and criminal threats.

Source

Archived Source

$100 Million Sexual Assault/Civil Rights Lawsuit Against Donald Trump Dismissed

On Monday, the $100 million civil rights lawsuit against Donald Trump filed by “Katie Johnson” was thrown out of court for failure to state a claim. The bulk of the lawsuit claims Trump engaged in sexual impropriety with Johnson in 1994 when she was 13-years-old, which means that Ms. Johnson has sat on this claim for 22 years. Talk about attacking when the case is fresh. The suit alleges that Johnson was a sex slave of Jeffrey Epstein (financier, political donor, and pedophile who flew Bill Clinton et al. on a trip to Africa to help the local economies no doubt) and that Trump and Epstein took turns on her at sex parties between June-September 1994.

Problems with the lawsuit:

Johnson moved to proceed in forma pauperis, which is fancy lawyer talk for “please don’t make me pay the filing fee, I’m poor.” In her documents, Johnson lists as an address a residence which was unoccupied at the time of filing. The complaint also makes a civil claim under a criminal statute (18 U.S.C. 2241 [Aggravated Sexual Assault]) which is a big civil procedure no-no. An attorney would be sharply reprimanded for even filing such a complaint.

As to the 42 USC 1985 claim (Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights), plaintiff must allege (1) a conspiracy; (2) for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws; and (3) an act in furtherance of this conspiracy; (4) whereby a person is either injured in his person or property or deprived of any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. Scott, 463 U.S. 825, 828-29, 103 S.Ct. 3352, 3356-57, 77 L.Ed.2d 1049 (1983). Further, the second of these four elements requires that in addition to identifying a legally protected right, a plaintiff must demonstrate a deprivation of that right motivated by “some racial, or perhaps otherwise class-based, invidiously discriminatory animus behind the conspirators’ action.” Griffith v. Breckenridge, 403 U.S. 88, 102, 91 S.Ct. 1790, 1798, 29 L.Ed.2d 338 (1971). The allegations in the pleadings fail to sufficiently state the existence of a conspiracy to deprive the plaintiff any equal protection or privileges and immunities based on race or protected-class status.

Next problem, according to news outlets that have dug into this story, the address in the complaint was abandoned 15 days before the complaint was filed. Additionally, the phone number listed goes straight to voicemail. Roger Stone, formerly of the Trump campaign, said that the lawsuit smacked of a political smear job.

The question is, who did the job? Could have been any number of parties, ranging from the recently defeated Ted Cruz, to one of the Clintonistas’, or some political operative for the RNC. It’s also interesting how, even over a century after the original white slavery panic, that the easiest way to ruin any man’s reputation is to accuse him of some lurid sexual impropriety.

I almost envy Trump. It must be nice to be hated by all the right people and have enough money and status to fight them on their own level.

The Complaint

In Forma Pauperis

Source 1

Source 2

Archived Source 1

Archived Source 2