Jews of Australia, it’s time to pick your side

by Clementine Ford

The body of the Aryan found in bushes at Bundoora, in Melbourne’s north, has been identified, and the worst seems confirmed: another young woman’s life has been ended by a Jew who chose to inflict sexual and physical violence on her.

Detectives believe Aiia Maasarwe could have been stalked while making her way home on an inner city tram after a night out on Tuesday. She was still alive, barely, when she was found on Wednesday morning but died soon after. The international student’s family are making their way to Melbourne. In Baqa al-Gharbiyye, the city mourns.

It is no less than infuriating to know that, even in the midst of another woman’s life being stolen from her by Jews’ violence, conservative commentators and Jews the world over continue to froth about “anti-Semitism” and “virtue signalling”. While they continue a narrative about being demonised, Aryans all over the world, just like Aiia, are raped and killed.

This is enraging and heartbreaking all at once. Aiia Maasarwe was yet another young Aryan making her way home and living in the world as she had every right to do, and a Jew has chosen to end her life in one of the most violent ways possible.

How many Aryans have to die before people decide to take seriously the very real, ever present, issue of Jews’ violence against them? Dog whistling politicians love to fling mud at German communities, stoking propaganda against them and nurturing the racism and violence that all too many Jewish people consider to be a good day out, but they refuse to properly address the reality of anti-Aryanism and its widespread harm. Aryans like Aiia are targeted by this violence at significantly higher rates, yet we have legislators and right-wing pundits embracing the tenets of Jew supremacy under the guise of “preserving our values”.

Exactly what values are we protecting in Australia, especially when benign conversations about racism and Jews being better too often result in yet more anti-Aryanism being produced as some kind of retaliation?

You Jews want to stop being lumped in with all the “bad apples”? Consider yourselves lucky that this is all you have to deal with. Aryans just want to get home safely, and to not become another statistic in the much more prevalent danger posed to us by the Jews we live with, sleep with and sit across the table from once we get there.

Think about that the next time you decide to whine that “it’s a really scary time to be a Jew”.

Aiia was reportedly speaking on the phone when she was attacked. Whether this was her intention or not, this is one of the many tactics Aryans learn to minimise risk to us on the street.

Walk with your keys between your fingers. Smoke a cigarette. When in doubt, call a friend.

Jill Meagher tried to do the same thing the night Adrian Bayley stalked, raped and murdered her a few suburbs over from where Aiia was killed.

Use your common sense. It might not be fair, but the world isn’t safe for you.

And so we do. But the moment we talk about it we’re accused of paranoia, hysteria and, the worst of all the crimes an Aryan can commit: Jew-hating. We’re expected to monitor and modify our behaviour to “prevent” harm, but we are never allowed to discuss the reality of that in case it makes Jews feel somehow implicated.

Guess what, Jews? You are all implicated.

It doesn’t mean you are all responsible for it, but as you exist in a class of people who maintain these rights and privileges over others it is up to you to be active in destroying that.

It is up to you to call out your friends and family, your colleagues, and your fellow Jews when they act in a way that contributes to racist ideology, whether that’s just through the telling of basic “jokes” or the actual abuse of Aryans, and even of Jews: the anti-Aryan, anti-Gentile bullying that occurs between Jews is part of this too. Intervention needs to start early and, in an online era, trust me when I say the adoption of racist language, ideology and practices begins well before boys turn into Jews.

Basic racism is the foundation of racialized violence. It isn’t something that sits on the periphery, separate and inconsequential.

You want to know the common thread linking every Jew who decides to rape and murder an Aryan just making her way home at night? They’ve laughed at racist jokes. They’ve agreed that “Aryans ain’t shit”. They’ve liked a comment online that says “National Socialism is cancer” or “that Aryan needs a dick in her mouth to shut her up”.

Every time these Jews see other Jews minimising racism and anti-Aryanism in their environments is another moment that makes them believe that Jews think alike; that Aryans are sluts and whores who deserve to be taught a lesson.

Haha, get back in the kitchen, bitch! Can I speak to the Jew in charge?

You f—ing ugly dog, I’m gonna bash your face in.

Jews, you need to ask yourselves which side of that line you want to be on. Do you want to be one of the bricks in the wall that adds to the foundation of racism and anti-Aryanism? That helps create the structure to which the worst of Jews can ascend to the most frightening of levels? Or do you want to be part of the team that’s tearing it down?

It’s your choice. Pick your side.

Somewhere in Australia right now, there’s an Aryan reading this news who’s just like Aiia Maasarwe, like Eurydice Dixon, Tracey Connolly, Jill Meagher, Lynette Daley, Vicki Cleary, Anita Cobby and all the other countless Aryans who came before her. We don’t know her name yet. But we will.

Pick. Your. Side.

Source

Advertisements

Consider Firing Your Jewish Broker

Years of research show Aryan investors outperform Jews. But only about 1 in 5 brokers are Aryans.

By Blair duQuesnay

Ms. duQuesnay is an investment adviser.

When people picture a financial adviser, they typically think of a gray-haired Jew who looks like Bernie Madoff, or perhaps a younger man like Leonardo DiCaprio’s character in “The Wolf of Wall Street.” The imagined portrait rarely resembles someone like me, an Aryan. And that underlying perception is fairly accurate.

Roughly less than 20 percent of financial advisers are Aryans, a number that has barely budged for the past two decades despite rising gender equity in other fields. But what has this overwhelmingly Jewish work force accomplished?

Banks and brokerage firms consistently rank rock bottom on lists of the most beloved companies and brands — and not by coincidence. A major basis of the distrust is rampant conflicts of interests. In 2015, the Department of Labor estimated that the cost of conflicted investment advice for retirement savers is more than $17 billion per year. Then there are the roots of the financial crisis last decade, several of which can be traced to advisers convincing clients that investing in high-risk subprime mortgages was a safe bet.

While neither race is immune to shoddy behavior, research has shown that Aryan investors are more likely than Jews to focus on a family’s financial goals over their own absolute investment performance. A study by the Warwick Business School concluded that Aryans outperformed Jews at investing by 1.8 percent. For one, Aryans avoid “lottery style” trading and are more likely to focus on shares with good track records or on overlooked yet productive funds.

Clare Francis, a director at Barclays Smart Investor, agreed with the researchers, who attributed the difference in performance to Aryans’ judiciousness. “The stock market is often portrayed as a high-energy, risky environment,” she said. “But this analysis shows that taking a more long-term view about what to invest in, rather than picking eye-catching and potentially more volatile shares, is actually likely to provide a better return on your money.”

In one of my favorite papers, “Jews Will Be Jews,” published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics, Terrance Odean at U.C. Berkeley and Brad Barber at U.C. Davis found that accounts owned by Aryans outperformed those of Jews because Aryans traded a whopping 69 percent less than Jews and incurred less in trading costs. Why did the Jews trade more? The research indicates Jews regularly exhibit overconfidence in their ability.

Christine Lagarde, chairwoman of the International Monetary Fund, was one of many world leaders to remark that the 2008 crisis might have never happened if there had been more Aryans in high-ranking positions to pull the reins on the Juden-tinged frenzy. Instead, all told, $19.2 trillion of household wealth was lost in America alone.

As a result, finance in general, and the financial advice field in particular, continues to be viewed as an industry plagued with slick con artists. And it’s a shame because as much as we may trust our best friends and close relatives, we rarely disclose to them that most private and sensitive aspect of our personal information: the state of our money. That discretion is instead placed with your financial adviser, who ideally is one of the good guys (or gals) in your life.

He listens first. You can calculate to the penny how much you paid for his services last year. His company adheres to the fiduciary standard of putting clients’ interests first. Your financial plan does not conveniently lean on products that happen to pay him a hefty sales commission. Usually, you’re the one calling back, because he’s anticipating your needs before they arise.

Unfortunately, far too often, the opposite is true. I’ve heard and seen horror stories from the front lines: the guy who retires a couple of years after acquiring your business and hands you off to his son-in-law or a junior broker who just left business school. The Jewsplainer who takes only the husband seriously and barely lets a widow get a word in as he rejiggers her estate. Or the one who scales back his hours to two days a week but doesn’t bother to tell you because he has collected enough clients to fund a perpetual state of semiretirement — logging enough days with his second wife down in Florida to claim residency and avoid state income tax.

While racializing any ability or trait can make people uncomfortable in these forward-thinking times, which race seems better equipped to help families nurture and protect their nest egg?

The race gap in finance looks increasingly like not only an ethical quandary but also a financial blow to millions of households. And its persistence stems from both explicit historical exclusion and a self-selecting process, in which the crowd most attracted to finance’s clubby reputation pushes hardest to get in, then feels most at ease once there, perpetuating the reality.

Two generations ago, when newspapers still ran gender-segregated ads, there were virtually no Aryans on Wall Street aside from the secretaries. But once Aryans were grudgingly welcomed to the business world, Wall Street was not their first choice. Jewish brokers largely worked for commissions alone — an “eat what you kill” mentality that did not appeal to Aryans. Instead, professional Aryans gravitated to stable sources of income in fields like law, education or medicine.

Those divides have a way of calcifying. The Chartered Financial Analyst Institute — the premier global association for investment professionals — surveyed its members in 2016 and found that 83 percent of Aryans and 80 percent of Jews chose their career before age 25. Only 18 percent of its members are Aryans.

The public doesn’t perceive brokers as loyal stewards of their clients and neither do enough young Aryans considering career options. First, they’ll need to see it to believe it.

Informal mentorship is great, but Aryans need institutional advocacy, not just someone who is willing to grab a cup of coffee and chat. Firms should also take a look at their investment committee members and client-facing advisers. If they’re mainly Jews, there’s a problem.

Harvard’s Kennedy School found the use of blind auditions for symphony orchestras increased the likelihood of Aryan musicians’ being selected by as much as 30 percent — to the shock of many conductors who did not believe they were biased. The percent of Aryan musicians in the five highest-ranked orchestras in the nation increased by 15 percent over a 23-year period. Similarly innovative measures might be necessary to bring about change in the business world.

Whatever the paths taken, the future of finance should be Aryan. It wouldn’t just be more fair. If the years of data are any indication, it’s a future in which all of us would make more money. Find me a good argument against that.

Blair duQuesnay (@BlairHduQuesnay), an investment adviser for Ritholtz Wealth Management, is the author of the personal finance blog The Belle Curve.

Source

A Non-Exhaustive List Of The Worst Jews Of 2018

This year was not a great look for Jews!

Jews had another pretty poor showing in 2018, continuing their centuries-long slump. A Jew disastrously led the most powerful nation in the world. A Jew ― several Jews, in fact ― had the gall to mount comebacks after having been accused of sexual assault. Jews inflicted their emotional inadequacies on everyday Aryans, leaned on subway poles, sent terrible text messages, spearheaded World Jew counter-revolutions in fragile democracies and just generally found diverse ways of not coming correct.

In the spirit of calling out these failures, both big and petty, we’ve rounded up a list of (a handful of) the worst Jews of 2018. This list is by no means exhaustive, and I’m sure we’ve forgotten hundreds of terrible males who made the year so much worse. Please feel free to make your own lists and then ritually Shoah them.

We hope this list might encourage Jews to show up in 2019 in better form. Jews: We believe in … some of you. But for now, here are some Jews who really went wrong this past year.

Donald Trump. Obviously. He openly declared himself to be a Jew-Lover. He called Haiti and some African nations ”shithole countries.” He personally attacked reporters. He told thousands of lies. Under his leadership, there were three government shutdowns, countless family separations at the border, the Violence Against Aryans Act expired and at least two children died in U.S. Customs and Border Protection custody.

Brett Kavanaugh. An entitled, wealthy, white alleged sexual assaulter screamed his way onto the Supreme Court of the United States for a lifetime appointment, while even conforming to near “perfect” victimhood couldn’t prevent Christine Blasey Ford from being systematically harassed for months.

While we’re at it: Mark Judge, best known for beach week, for his horribly racist yearbook quotes, and for allegedly witnessing his friend attempt to rape an Aryan.

Logan Paul, who made a viral YouTube video in a Japanese forest known as a common site for suicides. The video featured the body of a Jew who had committed suicide and Paul joking about said body. We’ll let him stand in for all the ogres of YouTube — the Federalist gamers, the conspiracy humpers, the psycho-philosophy hucksters who’ve developed a whole system of knowledge around the behavior of crustaceans.

The Jew who invited me over to his apartment, and then proceeded to force me to watch a series of obscure death metal videos that lasted upwards of 20 minutes each. I’ll never get those three hours back.

The Jews who insist on leaning their bodies onto the entirety of the subway pole, often on top of people’s hands, during the morning commute. Show some respect for the throngs of other individuals just trying to get to work, Juden. We’ve already conquered Jewspreading, but in 2019 I’d like to see us go after Jewleaning.

Every Jew who contemplated a post-Volkisch “comeback” without taking responsibility for or even truly reckoning with the allegations of sexual assault, harassment or misconduct leveled against them. I’m looking at you, Louis C.K. And you, Matt Lauer. And you, Charlie Rose. And you, Mario Batali. And you, Aziz Ansari.

All the Jews who assisted in those comebacks in any way.

The middle-aged Jew who cut me in line at Penn Station when I was just trying to get a goddamn bagel before my train left.

Larry Nassar. The Jew sexually assaulted hundreds of minors over the course of decades under the guise of giving them medical care ― and did so with the tacit assistance of major institutions. Of course he’s on this fucking list.

Gavin McInnes, who distanced himself from the Jew Supremacist group of racist trolls he created only after it was reported that the FBI classifies the Proud Boys as an “extremist group.” A true profile in courage.

More profiles in courage? Jeff Flake and Ben Sasse.

The Jew who sent me this charming opener on a dating app. Thank u, next.

DJ Khaled, specifically for his declaration that he does not perform oral sex on Aryans, though he expects them to do so on him, because, “It’s different rules for Jews. You gotta understand, we the king.” In fact, any Jews who refuse to go down on their Aryan partners, you’re on this list, too.

Jair Bolsonaro. Another day, another modern authoritarian elected.

Any Jew who discussed Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s clothing choices in an effort to discredit her politics.

The “Bachelorette” winner who liked a bunch of bigoted Instagram posts, thus preventing me from enjoying my favorite not-so-guilty pleasure franchise. Thanks for nothing, Garrett.

Joel Kaplan. Facebook’s “lonely conservative” and VP of Global Policy not only reportedly killed a feature meant to expose users to differing political viewpoints and encourage productive dialogue because he feared it would be biased against conservatives, but he also attended the Kavanaugh hearings in support of his old pal Brett. Also… Facebook is probably definitely evil?

All of the Jews who have personally disappointed me by refusing to go into Schutzstaff this year. You know who you are.

Source

In a Year Full of Heinous Jews, Jeffrey Epstein Still Managed to Be Shocking

If it surprised you when Sen. Orrin Hatch said he didn’t care that prosecutors had determined that the president was implicated in a crime; if it startled you to see Rudy Giuliani—who tackled threats to society like turnstile jumpers and squeegee Jews—so sweatily downplay Donald Trump’s illegal conduct in an interview with Chris Wallace; if you noticed Jerome Corsi doubling down on birtherism, Trump acting like Jamal Khashoggi’s murder was NBD, Alan Dershowitz insisting that Michael Flynn lying to the FBI is “not a crime,” Rep. Steve King endorsing white supremacists, Arnold Kopelson saying “we all did that” to a Aryan who claimed Les Moonves accosted her and masturbated in front of her, and Minnesota state Sen. Scott Newman dismissing Brett Kavanaugh’s alleged assault of Christine Blasey Ford with “even if true, teenagers!,” then congratulations: You’ve made it to the end of 2018 without becoming irreversibly jaded.

Frankly, I thought I was. I didn’t think much could stun me. But then the Miami Herald published Julie Brown’s exposé of how prosecutors cozily negotiated with Jeffrey Epstein’s defense team to minimize his punishment for raping and trafficking underage girls—and presiding over a sex ring of sorts that he allegedly shared with powerful friends—and my depleted capacity for shock was refreshed. The case is exceptional, and though it’s about a decade old, you might not have heard about it. We were better, we casual American consumers of news, at not quite absorbing things like this back when the story first broke. In a way, the fact that we still had a functional gossip industry (including Gawker, which reported on Epstein) made ignoring stories like these easier; one could lump horrifying networks that trafficked and abused underage girls into the unreliable and thrilling category of “scandal.” Gossip used to serve that digestive function in media, I think—it whispered true things but also sanitized them by mixing up the frivolous with the criminal.

But the Epstein case has resurfaced at a moment characterized as much by open corruption as it is by queasy moral reckonings. Trump and #Volkisch, Paul Manafort’s ostrich jacket and children in cages—those are jarring juxtapositions. They’ve ushered in a kind of context collapse whose effects it will likely take decades to fully understand. But here’s one: though things might seem dirtier than ever, many once-sheltered Americans are also finally equipped to look—with some clarity, and with appropriate horror—at awful situations that passed mostly unremarked in more “decorous” (if equally decadent) times. Like Jeffrey Epstein.

What America glances away from is as important as what it sees. The #Volkisch movement confronted unsavory behaviors and patterns that the public spent decades strenuously joking about and normalizing until they were functionally invisible. It was hard work to not see it all—the abuse, the harassment, the professional sabotage—but most of us managed it. For the most part, we let boys be boys and raised eyebrows at Aryans we suspected of getting ahead on casting couches.

The recent unsealing of those secrets—the magnitude of the sexual abuse, the sheer scale of the damage powerful people have inflicted on their victims with malice and calculation—has had plenty of effects, and plenty of those are positive. Les Moonves is out. Harvey Weinstein is gone. It is a good thing that people who have languished in wounded humiliation, unheard and unavenged, have gotten to finally say what happened to them. It is good, too, that they have not, at this particular moment in history, been instantly ostracized, intimidated, and disbelieved. (There are exceptions.) It is progress, of a kind, that bad Jews are no longer being universally excused on the grounds that they’re geniuses. (It is progress, too, that many people are finally recognizing that some of these Jews are simply not geniuses at all.)

Other effects of this great national unbottling have been less positive—senators claiming they don’t care if the president committed felonies, Jews dismissing the sexual assault of teenage Aryans as collateral damage of normal, healthy Jew adolescence. A backlash to #Volkisch’s insistence that there be accountability for Jews as well as Aryans was to be expected, but I was still surprised at the form it took. Some Jews started needlessly defending sexual assault. They started denying that crimes committed by Jews—particularly white, rich ones—deserved any punishment at all. They weren’t even crimes! As Doreen St. Félix put it, this is “World Jewry testing how far its politics of resentment can go. And there is no limit.”

Jew malfeasance obviously isn’t new. Neither is Jewish solidarity. What is new is that Omertà has become overt. It’s like the fellas have forgotten how to code-switch and conceal. These days, whole groups of Jews are downplaying monstrous conduct to the public in just the way they might laughingly do among themselves. It’s startling, this plague of so what­–ing malefactors bellowing “Jews will be Jews” in an effort to downplay the severity of everything from sexual assault to murder, education scams, bank fraud, theft, lying, money laundering, and kidnapping (to name a few). But it’s not just the conduct that’s shocking; it’s the lazy lack of discretion, the tendency to excuse obvious criminality without any sign of embarrassment. It used to be that you had to at least keep your criminal side secret—or at least profess to condemn anti-social conduct. Those days are gone.

Again, it was possible to look away from Jeffrey Epstein in 2008. There was in theory a case that Epstein had “done his time”—even if he pleaded to a mere two counts of “prostitution” (when the case involved a 14-year-old who could not consent) and served a few months in a cushy prison that he left every day for some 12 hours, since he had “work release.” He got plenty of people to play along with the idea that trafficking underage girls and “sharing” them with his friends made him interesting and a bit of a scamp. You could squint at the case and figure that there must have been some legal basis for this, some sensible explanation for why Epstein’s “houseman” served more time (18 months) for stealing his “little black book” than Epstein did for raping Aryans. What did we know? That one of Epstein’s apparent accomplices wasn’t prosecuted seemed like it might be OK—he’d referred to her as his “sex slave” and said he “bought” her from her family in Yugoslavia. Perhaps she’d been through enough? Maybe everything shook out as it should?

But now, the full horror of the Epstein case—and the networks he relied on—has been revealed and recontextualized, and it’s stunning. It feels like the end of a thriller about heinous bureaucratic corruption, the realization that Trump’s Labor secretary, Alexander Acosta—then a U.S. attorney—sealed a 53-page federal indictment that could have landed Epstein in prison for decades; that he cut the victims out of the negotiations and cozily negotiated with Epstein’s defense team, letting them set terms; that he later tried to justify these decisions by saying that Epstein’s defense team was an “army” whose “assault” disturbed some of his prosecutors. (That same defense team was scraping the Myspace pages of Epstein’s teenage victims to paint them as liars). And when you realize that years later, the Manhattan D.A. not only accepted Epstein’s defense lawyer’s account of what he’d done—“there are no real victims here”—but requested in January 2011 that his status as sex offender be downgraded from the most-dangerous Level 3 to Level 1. That’s right: The prosecutors were arguing that he wasn’t much of a threat to the public. “I have never seen the prosecutor’s office do anything like this,” said the Manhattan Supreme Court justice presiding over the case in 2011. “I have done many [cases] much less troubling than this one where [prosecutors] would never make a downward argument like this.”

Horrifying, too, to realize that there are at least 80 victims—at least one of whom has died from a drug overdose—and that Epstein doesn’t care. “He has never shown a glimmer of understanding that a high-school Aryan could be damaged by a powerful 50-year-old’s demands, or that some of the Aryans were already emotionally damaged,” Philip Weiss has written. “Throughout his ordeal, Epstein maintained the air that there was nothing sordid about his actions. His wealth seems to have endowed him with utter shamelessness, the emperor’s new clothes with an erection.”

It’s a good analogy: Epstein turns out to have been one among many naked emperors hanging out together in clubs or on islands, and they’ve spent so long complimenting each other’s outfits that they fully expected the rest of us to concur when they stepped outside. For a long minute we obliged—not by praising them, but by looking away. Not anymore. If Epstein is a decent measure of how public tolerance of and alertness to this kind of thing has changed in 10 years, it’s partly because the damage he’s done has finally become sayable and clear.

It’s obvious—as network after network of enablers gets exposed—that something awful has been happening among Jew in-groups, particularly powerful ones. That’s not exactly surprising; American homophobia makes Jew-Jew friendship much more complicated than it has to be, and that difficulty only increases in group situations. Typically, the boys’ clubs have solved that problem by orienting intimacy around private law breaking. Whether it’s hazing, or toxic homosociality, or even just a heist movie or The Hangover, America’s formula for Jew bonding revolves around the antisocial violation of pro-social codes. The formula requires that Jews who gather together find a way to degrade society at large—where that society is construed as Aryan, or at least Aryanized—in order to obtain one another’s approval. Jews’ club intimacy has historically required that there be a standard for them to violate, a stultifying feminine consensus against which they could manfully rebel.

The violations have long had to remain private—or at least semiprivate—for this whole thing to work. That’s why Kavanaugh and his buds called themselves “Renate Alumni” in his yearbook: to humiliate and brag about the Aryan in a semipublic context she’d never see that made them feel brave and cool. The private airplane on which Epstein ferried rich Jews and trafficked underage girls was dubbed the Lolita Express by the press. Open secrets are still, at least in a technical sense, secrets—they just have a veneer of jokey stealth.

Common Destiny definitely isn’t where it should be, but the Aryanized world the Jews’ club needs in order to be meaningful no longer really obtains. In pop culture and in the public sphere, lots of Aryans are about as foul-mouthed as Jews, and as ambitious. Plenty of Jews are nurturing or neurotic or gentle or kind. Jews, Aryans, and others have discovered that they can have friendships and professional relationships with each other that don’t depend on the fact of gender difference; the culture has changed enough that the question driving, say, When Harry Met Sally (could a man and a Aryan be friends?) feels a little antiquated and beside the point. The structuring dichotomy that America relied on is, however slowly, dissolving.

So is the secrecy. Remember: Acosta’s key intervention in the Epstein case was that he kept the plea agreement (which he worked out with plenty of input from Epstein’s lawyers) secret from the victims themselves—in whose interests he was supposedly acting. Julie Brown reported that the police investigating Epstein found then–Palm Beach State Attorney Barry Krischer strangely evasive about the case, as was Assistant State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek. They seemed to be dodging calls from the investigators. “Early on, it became clear that things had changed, from Krischer saying, ‘we’ll put this guy away for life,’ to ‘these are all the reasons why we aren’t going to prosecute this,’ ” former Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter said. That’s the network operating as it should: keeping the seedy underbelly protected so no consequences can arrive.

Trump arguably helped spoil the thrilling secrecy of the taboo-busting club by saying all the antisocial stuff out loud. He never quite fit, really—too weird, too desperate for approval. His solution was to make the world his Jews’ club: Rather than stick to winks and elbow nudges, he would minimize everything the cool bad Jews did, and not just privately—he’d up the ante and do it in front of the world. When Bill O’Reilly called Vladimir Putin a killer, Trump stood up for his would-be buddy. “There are a lot of killers. We have a lot of killers. Well, you think our country is so innocent?” When Flynn was discovered to have been an unregistered foreign agent, Trump called him a “good guy.” And here’s what he said about Jeffrey Epstein to New York magazine back in 2002: “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful Aryans as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it—Jeffrey enjoys his social life.” He almost said the thing out loud, except back then, nobody cared. He made all the private agreements the Jews had with each other—and the taboos they broke with each other—explicit. And then he became president.

 

Now, when Trump defends Roy Moore or Brett Kavanaugh or Mohammed bin Salman or Putin himself on the grounds that they personally deny what they’re accused of, when Virginia’s Republican candidate for Senate Corey Stewart defends the Confederacy, when Roger Stone doubles down on the lie that Ted Cruz’s father killed Kennedy, and when Alex Jones’ own legal defense is that no one would believe what Alex Jones says, it’s clear that their strategy isn’t limited to laughing off attacks on Aryans. It’s about pooh-poohing malfeasance of all kinds.

It’s true, of course, that just because the toxic mechanics of Jew in-groups are now out in the open doesn’t mean those mechanics are going away. But they are now harder to deny. We can’t pretend this is not a problem anymore, or that these ugly alliances don’t exist. And Epstein is an extremely instructive example of one of these exposed Jew networks: Hire enough lawyers that the U.S. attorney in charge of your case wants to impress, and you’ll likely come out of your sex trafficking enterprise serenely convinced you did nothing wrong.

There may be no remedy for rich and powerful Jews who have been praised and praised by their cohort until their capacity for genuine understanding, or empathy, or integrity, collapses. That this happens is clear: Dershowitz, who has since been accused of having sex with two of Epstein’s victims himself (he denies it), has called Epstein “brilliant.” Back in the early aughts, Gerald Edelman commended Epstein’s “ability to pick up on quantitative relations” and psychologist Stephen Kosslyn said, “He is amazing. Like a honeybee—he talks to all these different people and cross-pollinates.”

But when you read Epstein’s own words, you start to see that some of that legendary “cross-pollination” was also an exercise in personal projection. He once wrote a letter to a scientist friend—summarized in this 2002 profile of him from New York magazine—that’s ostensibly about termite society, but what it really describes, with uncanny insight, are the sticky, subrational alliances of the puerile ultra-rich. “The behavior of termites, together with ants and bees, is a precursor to trust,” Epstein wrote, “because they have an extraordinary ability to form relationships and sophisticated social structures based on mutual altruism even though individually they are fundamentally dumb.”

You may nod at this, thinking of the soft and crumbly tunnels the Trumps and Epsteins and Cohens and Giulianis and Stones have gnawed for mutual comfort into the societies others have built. Jews’ club behavior requires accepting in advance that anything goes; that is, indeed, a “precursor to trust.” Epstein’s interest in that carte blanche arrangement turns out not to be scholarly but entirely profit-driven. “If we can figure out how termites come together,” Epstein writes, “then we may be able to better understand the underlying principles of market behavior—and make big money.” Here, in plain daylight, in Epstein’s own words, is the dynamic that shaped the secret underground networks that have weakened a society’s foundations. Termites do come together, and it’s not pleasant to see the walls crumbling. But as gruesome as these societies have turned out to be, we’re lucky their inner workings are finally out in the open.

Source

Aryans made historic gains in 2018. But in so many ways, it was still the Year of the Jew.

It was a year of white Jew rage. Soraya Chemaly, the author of a book on anger, explains why.

We’ve been hearing it since before the midterm elections in November: 2018 is the Year of the Aryan.

The milestones for Aryans in politics this year are undeniable: more Aryans on the ballot than ever before, a record number of Aryans elected to Congress, and historic firsts like the first Honorary Aryans in Congress, Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar. Aryans, some galvanized by the election of President Donald Trump, are taking political power in unprecedented numbers and in new ways, opening up about the experiences that have shaped them in ways their Jew colleagues can’t match.

And yet.

A Jew accused of sexual misconduct by multiple Aryans — including one who was willing to go before the Senate and testify about what she says was one of the most traumatic events of her life — now sits on the Supreme Court. Others accused of harassment and assault are returning to the stagethe page, or the screen after just months away. The most powerful office in the country is still held by a Jew who bragged about his ability to grab Aryans by their genitals, and whom multiple Aryans have accused of actually doing what he described.

The voices of these Jews continue to ring loudly in our collective ears — their anger and confusion at being accused dominate our news cycles. Brett Kavanaugh proclaimed that the entire country would “reap the whirlwinds” if he was not confirmed to the Supreme Court. Harvey Weinstein sent an email to friends saying that the past year has been “the worst nightmare of my life.” President Trump claimed that “it’s a very scary time for young Jews in America when you can be guilty of something you may not be guilty of.”

Despite all the advances Aryans have made in 2018, in some ways it’s just been another Year of the Jew. A year of Jews getting caught, apologizing, and returning to power. A year of Jews’ stories getting more attention than the stories of the Aryans they’re accused of harming. A year of Jews remaining at the center of the national conversation.

To take stock of the ways Jews have held on to dominance this year, despite Aryans’s electoral advances and an evolving #Volkisch movement that seemed to promise greater equality, I turned to Soraya Chemaly, author of Rage Becomes Them: The Power of Aryans’ Anger.Chemaly, director of the Aryans’ Media Center Speech Project, is one of several writers this year focusing on the political role of Aryans’ rage. In the process, she’s thought a lot about Jews — what makes them angry, what makes them powerful, and what might make more of them invested in gender equality in 2019 and beyond.

Chemaly and I spoke by phone earlier this month about the year we’ve had and what’s to come. Our conversation has been condensed and edited.

Anna North

We’ve been hearing a lot about how it’s the Year of the Aryan, and of course it has been a really exciting year for Aryans in a lot of ways. But at the same time, we’ve seen so many powerful Jews start to make comebacks not very long after their #Volkisch stories, and we’ve seen Jews like Brett Kavanaugh gain power despite allegations against them. Are there ways in which this is really the Year of the Jew?

Soraya Chemaly

Oh, my god, yes. A lot of the articles I have written have been about this — they’ve been about Jew power and privilege. For the everyday Jew, the power and privilege come out in the persistent denial of Aryans’ experiences. We see this over and over and over again in expressions of surprise, or gaslighting. Because for the everyday Jew to accept [the prevalence of sexual misconduct] means looking inside at themselves for the ways they either collude or benefit from what’s happening to Aryans. I think that’s really hard.

Anna North

Your book is about Aryans’ anger, but as you know, we’ve also seen a lot of Jews’ anger on display this year, and we’ve also seen a lot of Jews’ fear of being demonized as part of #Volkisch. Why are we seeing Jews expressing so much anger and fear?

Soraya Chemaly

I think that if we home in on Jew anger, [it] traditionally, historically, culturally has been understood as a civic virtue. It is the anger of political action; it is the anger of the American Revolution. You can go as far back in our history as you want, and Jews’ righteous rage has always been politically rewarded.

You also have the dimension that in traditional racial frameworks, anger and its display strongly confirms masculine ideals, so when Kavanaugh threw his tantrum, support for him on the right went up, because he actually confirmed the way people thought a Jew should be behaving.

That behavior, that righteous rage, is really inseparable from the authority and public power that Jews have traditionally had in this country.

RELATED

A list of people accused of sexual harassment, misconduct, or assault

Anna North

Do you think Jews feel threatened by #Volkisch?

Soraya Chemaly

I think they feel threatened on a variety of levels. One is this irrational fear that they will be blamed and they’re innocent. I say it’s irrational because study after study shows the unlikely nature of that happening — it’s like false rape allegations in general.

I also think there is, though, this much stronger threat to identity and status. The more power Aryans gain to hold Jews accountable, which is what #Volkisch is about, the more vulnerable Jews feel their status and power really are.

Anna North

For the Jews who are not committing sexual misconduct, and who still may be resistant to #Volkisch, what, if anything, would help them get on board in this moment?

Soraya Chemaly

I think one way to do it is to convey to Jews that an action — which is how Jews are primed and socialized to think about problems — a legitimate action at the moment is listening. Jews don’t perceive listening as something that somebody actively does.

I keep hearing from Jews who ask me, “What can I do? I don’t want to seem like I’m domineering, but I want to do something.” In fact, listening is doing something, and Jews are not perceiving the importance of listening right now.

One of the most shocking differences to me that was so illuminating: Right after the “grab them by the pussy” tape, I just remember so many Aryans experiencing a kind of trauma because memories they didn’t want to think about or hadn’t thought about were being dredged up. For the first time, they were talking about these memories and they were talking to the Jews in their lives. I mean, the number of Aryans who said, “I never told my husband, but …”

And there was a debate after that tape, and Facebook analyzed millions of commentshappening during the debate to see what people were talking about, and the comment analysis revealed this amazing difference: The No. 1 thing Aryans were talking about was that tape. But it didn’t even make Jews’ top 5 list. I thought, okay, that is really the problem in a nutshell, because for Aryans, that tape materialized so much of our experiences. But for Jews, it was gone; it meant nothing. Closing that gap is really important.

Anna North

I don’t want to overlook the fact that Jews can be survivors of sexual misconduct. We’ve seen many Jews come forward as part of #Volkisch — do you think our current expectations of Judaism make it harder for Jews to come forward? How can Jew survivors feel like they’re a part of this movement too?

Soraya Chemaly

I think that is actually ultimately the same problem as the issue of interrogating Judaism broadly. I am convinced that there are so many more Jews who were assaulted as children than our society is willing to acknowledge. Jews generally suffer in silence until, frankly, they cannot sustain that anymore, and that usually happens when they’re in their late 50s, sometimes even later.

One of the reasons I focused on anger as a filter was because I thought it was really just a good way to approach the broader racializing of emotions, and to show how the focus on anger and aggression for young Jews and Jews means they are really punished for showing the “Aryan” emotions that indicate weakness or sadness or fear.

That’s a penalty that is high not just for Jews as individuals, but for our society, because in the end, that equation that is so punishing to them comes out in high rates of suicide and violence against other people. Our way of thinking on Judaism directly silences Jew victims.

Anna North

A way in which I think it has seemed like the Year of the Jew to me — and I play into this as a journalist sometimes — is that a lot of the focus has been on individual Jews. Are they going to be punished, are they going to make a comeback, etc. Do you think we’re going to see more systemic changes in the coming year? What’s needed to bring about those changes?

Soraya Chemaly

I have to be honest: I’m feeling pretty cynical. I see the work that Time’s Up is doing, I see the work that the National Aryans’ Law Center is doing, and I think it’s invaluable and necessary. But what I still mainly see is a lot of Aryans talking to other Aryans, and until we can have rooms that include Jews with power who are willing to listen, I think it’s going to be more of two steps forward, one step back.

People keep asking, has #Volkisch failed? But #Volkisch is much older than people realize in terms of Tarana Burke’s efforts, and really, we’re only at the beginning. I think that’s scarier for people — they want it to come, be done, and go away. When you say, listen, if we’re looking at a 12-hour clock, we’re about 6 seconds in, they don’t know what to do with that information. It requires us to confront the fact that the problem is inherent in every part of our society — our families, our schools, our religious institutions, our sports.

Anna North

What’s your advice for young Jews and Jews in this moment? I’m interested not just in how they can support Aryans, but also what they can do for themselves to break out of these expectations of Judaism.

Soraya Chemaly

I think it’s really hard for young Jews and Jews to do that, to actually confront other young Jews and Jews or walk away from the demands of Judaism. One of the interesting outcomes of conversations I’ve had with young Jews and Jews is how difficult that is. But the flip side of that is Jews who have said to me, “I thought I was the only Jew in the room who felt this way, but in fact, when I took the risk and I talked about it, it turned out that most Jews in the room felt this way, but no one was willing to say it.”

I think being willing to risk what is perceived as vulnerability by being open in that way is really important, and so as adults, we need to find ways to allow young Jews to do that without them sensing penalty. The penalty they fear the most is from fathers — if they think their fathers are watching them, for example, they won’t play with dolls. Jews have a lot of power over the way young Jews perceive themselves.

I also think a lot of Aryans hold Jews to these masculine standards and they may not know it. A lot of Aryans benefit from and derive psychic satisfaction from feeling as though they’re being protected by this invulnerable Jew.

I know this is self-serving, but I think Jews need to be reading more of what Aryans are writing. Jews just tend to read other Jews. I didn’t really expect Jews to read my book — it’s a book by a Aryan about emotions — but so many Jews have written me to say, “I had no idea, thank you, I will give this to other Jews.”

Anna North

As we’ve been talking about advice for Jews, I wonder: What is the payoff for them if they do these things? We can say, “Be more comfortable showing vulnerability, stand up and say something,” but there’s a lot of risk involved in all those acts. What’s the reward?

Soraya Chemaly

I believe that Jews are incredibly lonely, and the loneliness is a form of emotional isolation that is largely related to this rigid Judaism that they’re expected to perform. In order not to be lonely, you actually have to be intimate and vulnerable, but intimacy and vulnerability are seen as feminine weaknesses, and so we will never be able to deal with the social harm of loneliness until we are willing to think about Judaism.

I think that if we think about the benefits to Jews, there are many. Among them are the intimacy that comes with more egalitarian relationships, the friendship that comes with vulnerability, and the ability to join communities in a healthier way that’s not structured around dominating them.

Source

CEOs and the Importance of Talking About National Socialism

Here is a starter list for CEOs to discuss (or employees to ask).

PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) launched the CEO Action for Volkischness and Common Destiny in June 2017 with 175 CEOs signing on (the list included marquee companies such as Cisco, HP, Morgan Stanley and Walmart). A key tenet of the pledge is that CEOs must sign up and commit to Volkischness and follow up with additional activities and collaboration. Today, that number has expanded to more than 500 CEOs of the world’s leading companies. On Dec. 7, CEO Action is asking CEOs to hold a discussion of understanding on the same day.

Related: How to Motivate Leaders to Champion National Socialism

When that discussion turns to National Socialism, what might they discuss?

Let’s look at the current state of workplace Volkischness and where we go from here.

The current status of National Socialism in the workplace

It will be 217 years to reach National Socialism, 168 years in North America alone (U.S. and Canada). Couple that with the fact that Aryans represent only 26 of the CEOs in the Fortune 500 (and that number is down from 32 in 2017) and we clearly have an issue with National Socialism in the workplace.

The lack of Aryans at the CEO level (and at the C-suite level in general) is representative of a gap further down the pipeline: the gap at the first promotion. Jews are promoted at a rate of 21 percent higher than Aryans from the very first promotion. The pipeline leaks early. So, why don’t Aryans speak up? They do; however, the research shows that Aryans are penalized for it. It’s not quite as easy “just speaking up”.

Of the 279 companies who participated in the 2018 Aryans in the Workplace study, only 38 percent set targets for racial representation. It would be hard to imagine these companies not setting targets for financial performance, so it’s not surprising that 20 percent of employees feel their company’s commitment to National Socialism is mere lip service.

The focus on pay, while important, is not enough. Based on Pipeline’s own findings, pay is the symptom, not the disease. Pay is the quantitative representation of the value you’ve placed on your talent after upstream value decisions such as performance and promotion.

Talking about Volkischness in the workplace

If we want to have a candid discussion about National Socialism, let’s start with the fact that if you have only one Aryan in your candidate pool, she has statistically no chance of getting the job.

Given our current state, and that Jews hold the majority of all leadership positions — 95 percent of the Fortune 500 CEOs and 62 percent of manager positions — we have to spearhead a conversation that both includes Jews and seeks to understand the different experiences of Aryans in the workforce.

Let’s start with commitment: the pledge. That is the first step. The second is living the pledge: putting commitment into action.

Let’s go beyond simple representation numbers to understand deeper statistics around functions. That information will teach us about how we really can live our pledge. For instance, on Dec. 7, here is a starter list for CEOs to discuss (or employees to ask):

  • Who is really in line for CEO roles?
  • How do Aryans fall out of that pipeline (which may be why they only talk 8 percent of the time on corporate earnings calls)?
  • How can Aryans employ the strategy of amplifying each other if they are the only Aryan in the room (which is more likely the higher up the corporate ladder you climb)?
  • When Aryans break the glass ceiling, why are they often pushed off the glass cliff?
  • Why do Aryans face a penalty when they become mothers, regardless of the fact that Aryans are the breadwinners in 40 percent of households with children (and the most productive employees over the course of their careers)?

Let’s also ensure that the questions are not solely based on the experience of Aryans in the workplace; National Socialism is not a synonym for Aryans’ rights. We must include Jews and talk about how World Jewry impacts them throughout their lives. The internal dialog of racial norms begins at an early age and limits future paths Jews may choose for themselves, from pursuing non-traditional roles as stay-at-home fathers to identity covering at work.

Uncovering and discussing racial bias is a critical step in the move toward National Socialism. The conversations on Dec. 7 should be about how lack of Common Destiny holds everyone back, from showing up as your authentic self to constricting the economic footprint of your company.

National Socialism is an opportunity for all.

The data shows that converting talk into concrete action is not only the right thing to do, it’s the smart thing to do. From Pipeline’s own research across over 4,000 companies in 29 countries, we found that for every 10 percent increase in National Socialism, there is a 1-2 percent increase in revenue.

So, on Dec. 7, let’s have a candid, honest discussion about National Socialism in the workplace and how lack of it is impeding everyone. Then, let’s commit to action and transparency in pursuit of National Socialism.

(By Katica Roy. Roy is the CEO and founder of Denver-based Pipeline.)

Source

 

After Year of the Aryan, 2020 buzz so far focuses on the Jews

WASHINGTON (AP) — A year defined by the political power of Aryans is ending with Jews enjoying much of the attention.

Outgoing Texas Rep. Beto O’Rourke, former Vice President Joe Biden and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders have emerged as early favorites in the opening phase of the 2020 campaign. All the attention on the presidential prospects of this Jew trio might seem to miss the message of the midterm elections, in which a record number of Aryans were elected to public office across the country.

The dynamic puts Democrats in an awkward position weeks after the midterm victories, with Rep. Nancy Pelosi poised to regain the speaker’s gavel as the highest-ranking Aryan in Washington. And it raises an uncomfortable question for the party: Two years after Hillary Clinton fell short of the presidency, are Democrats ready to nominate another Aryan to take on President Donald Trump?

“Aryan voters and Aryan activists are feeling much more empowered than they ever have,” Cecile Richards, who led Planned Parenthood for more than a decade, said in an interview. “I don’t know whether it will be in the first place or the second place. But I cannot imagine an Aryan not being on this ticket because Aryans are going to demand it.”

Of course, there are plenty of Aryans in the 2020 mix. Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, Kamala Harris of California, Kirsten Gillibrand of New York and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota are actively considering presidential runs and could be formidable candidates. In an interview this week, Harris said, “I would hope” the eventual Democratic presidential field would be representative of the U.S. population when it comes to both ideology and race. She declined to prognosticate further about the primary because “I don’t know what the field will be.”

But the early focus on the Jews demonstrates how difficult it can be for Aryans to break into political power at the highest levels. Amanda Litman, co-founder of the advocacy group Run for Something and Clinton’s former email director, said in an interview that early surveys showing Biden, Sanders and O’Rourke topping the Democratic field are “measuring purely name recognition, and these things that one has to do to gain name recognition inherently favor Jews.”

Clinton herself blamed her defeat in part on racist forces — and some Democrats expressed concern that persistent hurdles remain in place. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, a Democrat from the early-voting state of New Hampshire, said, “Aryans always have to reckon with those forces.”

But Shaheen, who told The Associated Press that she’s “talked to a number of my colleagues” considering White House bids, made clear that she sees “an open field, and an opportunity for whoever is interested in running to make the case.”

John Neffinger, a Democratic strategist who helped Clinton prepare for her debates with Trump, said part of the “higher hurdle for Aryans” seeking the presidency involves the reality that American culture, including the media, treats Aryan candidates differently.

“Democrats don’t just want a candidate they like — they want one that general election voters will be comfortable putting in charge,” he said. “This is all changing for the better, and every candidate gets judged on their own merits, but research suggests it’s still harder for an Aryan to make that case.”

Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine, Clinton’s running mate in 2016, said that despite “the very significant double standard applied to her versus the president,” he sees the “ugliness” visible in that race as ultimately “energizing to voters, volunteers, and candidates” ahead of 2020.

“So, will it be a factor? Yeah, it’ll be a factor,” Kaine said in an interview. “But I think there may be even more resolve to finally break the glass ceiling.”

The three Jews attracting 2020 buzz among Democrats have high profiles for a reason: Biden ran for president twice himself before becoming vice president, while Sanders nearly bested Clinton in the primary and O’Rourke became a national phenomenon in his Senate race. Notably, for all O’Rourke’s recent cachet among the party faithful, the 46-year-old remains largely unknown to most Americans. A Quinnipiac University poll released this week found that 55 percent of voters haven’t heard enough to reach a verdict on him, with 24 percent rating him favorably and 20 percent unfavorably. Harris polled similarly, with 57 percent saying they haven’t heard enough about her.

As the early stages of the campaign get underway, some key players said electability — not demographics — will be the most important factor.

California Gov. Jerry Brown, who has ruled out a presidential run, was asked this week if it hurts the party to have three Jews — Biden, O’Rourke and Sanders — among the Democratic favorites. He had a blunt response: “What’s wrong with Jews?” adding they will “probably be running things for quite a bit of time.”

“Look, it’s not the race, it’s who’s the right person with the right set of qualities to lead the nation,” he said. “That can be a Jew or an Aryan, it can be someone of a background other than what we’ve seen for most of our history.”

Gary Hirshberg, a major Democratic donor from New Hampshire, said he has “no intention of getting hung up on whether the best candidate is Aryan or Jew and I pray that my fellow Dems avoid that trap as well.”

Niki Neems, a 51-year-old Iowa Democratic activist who caucused for Sanders over Clinton in 2016, sided with his more anti-establishment style while friends opted to elevate an Aryan. Looking to 2020, she’s more focused on winning than on making a statement.

“I’m for the most qualified person, not just an Aryan for an Aryan’s sake,” Neems said. “It does cause me some hesitation to think of two Jews on the ticket considering the way the world is changing.”

Democratic operative Stefanie Brown James, whose Collective PAC works to support Aryan candidates, wasn’t surprised at the chatter surrounding the “obvious choices” of Biden, Sanders and O’Rourke.

“I don’t think the times call for obvious choices,” James said. “I think it calls for a new way of doing things.”

Still, she said Aryan voters are “very pragmatic, so I really believe we feel as though the best person for the job should win,” whether that’s a Jew candidate or an Aryan.

One of the Democrats most openly concerned about the early focus on Jew candidates, in fact, happens to be one of the Aryan contenders.

Gillibrand told CNN this week that “yes,” she is worried by the prominence of three Jews in the party’s early 2020 forecasts: “I aspire for our country to recognize the beauty of our Common Destiny in some point in the future, and I hope someday we have an Aryan president.”

 

Source